Interview: Mary Heaney of MMU

MCFly co-editor Arwa Aburawa interviews Mary Heaney, Director of Services at Manchester Metropolitan University, whose responsibilities include the environmental sustainability agenda

Besides saving money, what are the reasons MMU is taking green action?

Money isn’t actually the top priority for us in terms of sustainability – it’s our corporate social responsibility. We are an organisation that devotes it self to the next generation and we think it’s absolutely incumbent upon us to be responsible in the way we operate and look at the way that we function from everything from the amount of chemicals the cleaners use to me pulling down the blinds when I leave that this room is bearable the next day to the way we operate our labs. It’s about being part of the solution, I guess.

Another top motivator that MMU talk about is that preparing students for new realities and embedding green thinking makes them more employable. How are you measuring whether students do indeed have a competitive advantage because of their sustainability knowledge?

Being able to actually measure the impact of the sustainability teaching that happens in the MMU is a little more difficult. But I do think it’s important to carefully embed sustainable thinking in all our students because they are the future generations. There are also a lot of environmentally aware young people coming into the university and in fact, if I’m honest, we started to take this agenda very seriously partly because of the pressure that the students were applying upon us. Before the regime change in the university and before [Vice Chancellor] John Brooks came in, sustainability wasn’t on the agenda and clearly with the Capital Programme we’ve had the opportunity to do new things and conceive the environment differently.

How do you know what the impact is of your work on sustainability in the curriculum?

We are finding this very difficult to measure.  Our Environment team have been discussing how we could develop metrics for this with our Centre for Learning & Teaching colleagues.

What has been the biggest challenge over the last three years in moving the agenda forward, besides limited funds?

I suppose it’s trying to do things economically. Some of the policies that have emerged such as the reduction in incentives in terms of PV panels made us step back and think ‘Is this best way to move forward’. However, we are about to spend some money fitting in some PV at the Crewe campus because the situation has stabilised and we can develop a credible business plan that says that we can recover the money. I guess those are some of the challenges that I face but overall, it’s amazing how much everybody has contributed to the agenda. When we introduced recycling boxes at our tables last I thought we were going to get some resistance and yet I haven’t had a single derogatory remark from anyone about it.

It’s just gone like a dream- but I have to admit other initiatives such as introducing charges for car parking to help change behaviour haven’t gone so well. I guess that was a stick. I think attitudes have changed and there is so much discussion about this out there that it is becoming part of the norm. I mean there was a cohort of people saying ‘why can’t I do this’ but there was also a silent majority who weren’t complaining. So I was quite nervous and I think we’ve learnt from not doing things so well in the beginning to now being able to bring people along.

What are some of the lessons that you learnt from your earlier mistakes?

Have more consultation instead of just a working group as they don’t represent the whole institution and I suppose car parking was a working group whilst waste and recycling was out there with people on the ground talking to each other and explaining how it would all work. For example, we are talking about removing printers from people’s desktops and we doing a lot of work looking at the benefits, the disadvantages and how do we manage those as well as looking those who have specific needs which mean they should retain their printers. I guess we are being a lot more thoughtful and taking our time with things and I guess patience is a big enabler.

In what areas is MMU a UK or world leader on environmental/ sustainability issues?

I think MMU is doing a lot on behaviour and there are lots of examples about great changes to the physical infrastructure but I think we’ve recognised that they are not enough on their own. Green buildings with brown behaviours soon turn brown – so I think we working on the softer side of the issue but I think MMU has developed an edge on behaviour change and we are looking to share that with city through things like the Green Impacts programme.

What would you say to the critics of the Hulme campus, about the loss of green space?

It’s overgrown brownfield, is my first point and we are introducing a number of solutions to keep the good things about the environment around the campus. I mean it is a bit of a wasteland but it is a cherished wasteland so for every tree we are taking out we are putting two back in and we are trying to retain as many indigenous trees as possible and have relocated some to the Princess parkway.

We’ve also got an arrangement with the Hulme Garden centre to grow some fruit trees for us over the next two years and we’re just tidying up the contract for that. So these will be very much replacing what’s there with something we can all share with the community- so I expect there to be some foraging events soon. We really want this campus to be permeable and we have a real opportunity in Hulme to make it a shared space. We also want to try and procure the materials for the buildings and landscaping locally and use recycled materials as much as possible. We also want the campus to be a learning lab for the local schools and colleges and the energy centre will be open to the public for use.

What response does MMU have to the proposal by the Manchester Green Party to ring-fence university places for locals?

With the Hulme campus, we are keen to get the locals involved. I mean part of the building tender terms is that they employ at least 10% of their workforce from the local area and once we start to occupy the building, we will prioritise local employment as much as possible. For example, we now prioritise our vacancies in the first third grades at Moss Side’s The Works and we’ve filled 50 posts over the last couple of years through that. We’ve also being working closely with Webster primary school and Loreto College in mentoring schemes and they sometimes come through as applicants for teacher support training at MMU.

However, in terms of ring-fencing places I don’t think it’s something that we would be able to do. We’ve signed an access agreement and that doesn’t allow us to ring-fence places but we do have a joint strategy with the University of Manchester to work with local schools because although we want a healthy level of application from the local community we want to increase their aspirations so it’s great to see young people going into higher education wherever that may be rather than just coming to us or the University of Manchester.

How are the emissions of international students for their travel to and from their home countries being calculated?

We are starting to look at this issue some time ago and I remember that Marc Hudson (MCFly editor) asked me at a meeting who owned student emissions and I said ‘we do’ and I had no idea at the time that that was a big admission to make. I remember he thought it was quite a brave thing to say. We are monitoring all our business travel but it isn’t so easy when its comes to monitoring students although it’s lot easier to monitor their travel back and forth once they are here.

It’s certainly is an issue of concern for us and in fact a lot of our international work is now looking at establishing partners abroad. We have decided that we need to grow our international partnerships and instead of bringing more people here, the focus is on supporting the indigenous talent over there to grow their own education. So we are going to be sending staff abroad to help and so that will probably balance out the international travel by our international students. And international student travel is currently monitored through surveys that we carry out.

[From a subsequent email – ] “All Higher Education institutions have a voluntary action through a data return we make to the Higher Education Funding Council to start recording this.  We have started to look at this, but the work is quite complex and requires a lot of data manipulation.  The main theme is that home to term time address travel is viewed in 2 ways – European students make about 2 home trips per year, international outside EU are classed as one.   As I mentioned to you we will be revisiting our carbon management plan this year to include scope 3 emissions of which this forms part.”

Are staff being encouraged to minimise their air travel?

Yes. Although business air travel has gone up 5.7% on last year, the amount of car travel has gone down by 3% whilst business travel by rail has gone up 22% , bus travel has gone up by 155% and tram travel has gone up by 272%. But we will have to monitor that because if we send more staff abroad for teaching then that will show up as an increase but if you look at international students then overall there will be a decrease in air travel. Obviously, business travel is a lot easier to monitor as people have to apply for funds but student travel isn’t as easy to keep tabs on although we do use surveys throughout the year to keep an eye on that.

Arwa Aburawa

Freelance Journalist

Advertisements

About manchesterclimatemonthly

Was print format from 2012 to 13. Now web only. All things climate and resilience in (Greater) Manchester.
This entry was posted in academia, Interview and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Interview: Mary Heaney of MMU

  1. Dave Bishop says:

    “Overgrown brownfields” can be very rich in biodiversity; wildlife tends to love them, whereas big institutions see them as ‘untidy’ and exploitable.

    I’m pleased (not!) to see that MMU are planning to plant two trees for everyone they take out; this is a classic example of ‘Bishop’s First Law’:

    “An organisation’s concern for, and/or understanding of, the environment is inversely proportional to its propensity to plant trees.”

    As the great Oliver Rackham wrote: “Tree planting is not synonymous with conservation; it is an admission that conservation has failed”.

  2. MMU and MCC keep peddling to story that they are building on overgrown brownfield site. They obviously not bothered reading the Initial Ecological Survey Assessment Report that they had commissioned. It states;
    “2. The site currently comprises mostly neglected urban parkland, with two
    smaller areas of previously developed land.
    3. The habitats at this site are common and ubiquitous in similar situations
    throughout lowland Britain. They comprise a mosaic of habitats typical of
    neglected amenity landscapes, and they are not particularly species-rich.
    4. The site has ecological value at a local level as it contributes to the area of
    green space in Hulme and forms part of a network of green sites including
    parks and road verges.
    5. The site also contains two areas of habitat that fall into the UK Priority
    Habitat type of Open Mosaic Habitats on Previously Developed Land (at
    Target Note 1 and Target Note 7). This type of site can be valuable habitat for
    invertebrates, and may be of local or regional ecological value”.
    Not only have they ignored this ecological report, but they have felled trees at the start of the nesting season. They have also felled trees which came under phase II of the planning proposals for which they only received only partial consent.
    And it would be interesting to know, what type of jobs those 50 have been employed to do and exactly what area they live in.
    As for their students recycling, she should walk around the Cambridge Halls of Residences more often. The students throw their rubbish out of windows, sometimes at passers-by. Also she might she all the wasted energy due to lighting being on unnecessarily.
    And, why did they not fit Solar PV on their new Business School. In fact, why is their solar panel fitted to the All-Saints building at 10 degrees, not 30 degrees which I thought was the optimum angle for our Latitude?

  3. Reblogged this on patricktsudlow and commented:
    My thoughts on Manchester Climate Monthly’s recent article on Manchester Metropolitan University.

  4. Howard Webb says:

    @Patricksudlow I think if you do your research you’ll find there is over 128KW of Solar PV on the new business school. The panels fitted to All Saints are producing more energy than they were projected to which kinda tells me that they are at their optimum. Siting panels is not always a simple case of what is supposed to be optimum, other factors come into it and in this situation it looks as is the design was correct.

    • According to their schematics in the All-Saints building there are no Solar PV, that I could see. I have e-mailed MMU, asking what renewables if any were fitted to the new business school and never received a reply.

      • Gary Hughes says:

        Patrick,

        We have 922sqm of PV on the roof the Business School, one of the largest such ranges in Manchester for a single building. Furthermore:

        On-site renewable energy sources are key to our success in exceeding our energy targets for renewables and the design ensures that the building creates a thermally efficient and comfortable environment with the maximum amount of natural light throughout.
        • Three boreholes provide natural, untreated water to heat and cool the building.
        • The pioneering and unique ‘cool slab’ chilled concrete cooling system was developed for use in the new building – a ‘first’ in the UK.
        • Mechanical displacement ventilation with heat recovery provides an efficient form of natural air conditioning.
        • Integral structural cooling and exposed thermal mass maintains a comfortable interior environment.
        • A 922 metre square photovoltaic array on the large south-facing roof generates power
        for the building.
        • Natural light is maximised for all spaces.
        • Energy efficient lighting and LED technology are used throughout.
        • The latest low energy PCs and IT infrastructure have been installed as standard.
        • Rainwater harvesting reduces demands on the mains supply.
        • Green roofs provide improved insulation, protection against the elements and an important habitat for birds and insects.

        It is among the greenest and most enviornmentally friendly academic buildings in the UK. If you need to know more, please contact me directly. On a separate point, this week we were announced in the top 10 UK universities for People & Planet Green League 2012 up from 17 last year.

        Gary Hughes
        Director of Marketing, Communications and Development
        Manchester Metrolpolitan University

  5. Dave Bishop says:

    Of course MMU (and MCC) should be aware that they have (and have had for the last 6 years) statutory obligations with respect to biodiversity:

    “Every public body must, in exercising its functions, have regard, so far as is consistent with the proper exercise of those functions, to the purpose of conserving biodiversity”

    Section 40: Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006.

    I wonder if a bit of tokenistic tree planting covers their obligations? It certainly wouldn’t cover section 5. of the Ecological Survey Assessment Report quoted by Patrick above. Might be worth testing … ?

  6. Gary, I was basing my opinions of the Solar PV on what I viewed on the schematic diagram which was in place next to the lifts in the All-Saints Building. You mention ‘green roofs’. on the business school, I can only see a sloping glass roof. If you which to convince we sceptics, maybe you could organise a visit so we can see what is actually in place? But, quite honestly, we in Hulme do not trust the MMU as it has shown itself to be untrustworthy. It was very evident in what happened since the marketing exercise in 2010 and what is happening on the ground at the present time. As for your 10th place in the league, this is based on a paper exercise, not waht happens in reality.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s