Have you signed up to attend the ever-shrinking Stakeholder “conference” (three and a half hours of dross?)  Have you found out if you’re allowed to attend?  We did, and … we’re not.  Maybe something to do with asking all those awkward questions (and rarely, if ever getting any answers)?  Nice to know that Steve Connor and his cronies are so keen to have open discussions about what’s going so very well, isn’t it?

This just landed in our personal inboxes

Dear Marc and Arwa

Regretfully we won’t be issuing you with an invitation to the March 4th conference but will make we sure pass on any notes or outcomes for you to publish on your blog.

Regards
Steve

Steve: you’ve found the time to send us a personal email, full of very sincere “regrets” and “regards.” How about keeping your promise that you made exactly a month ago to answer basic questions about who the sub-group chairs are – or aren’t. Or is it simply that you couldn’t find enough people to fill those roles?

Related posts
https://manchesterclimatemonthly.net/2013/01/21/scientific-study-predicts-2016-manchester-climate-conference-will-be-10-minutes-long-in-a-pub/

https://manchesterclimatemonthly.net/2013/01/18/newsflash-leaked-manchester-climate-steering-group-recruitment-questionnaire/

https://manchesterclimatemonthly.net/2013/02/03/sending-all-the-wrong-signals-on-climate-action-in-manchester-acertainfuture/

And of course, all the positive suggestions we made months ago

Open letter to Steering Group 2.0

… that were ignored.