Full Council of despair – #Manchester City Council in business-as-normal mode

After an hour of advertising for HS2, we got what we came for. The small and intrepid(1) band that ventured into Manchester Town Hall to witness “democracy” did indeed get to see what passes for democracy in action today.

It was a meeting of Full Council. For years this has been a three-ring circus. Real decisions are made in the meetings of the 9-member Executive (or rather, before them). Full Council, which all Council members are expected to attend unless they’ve got a damned good excuse (a death in the family, a holiday in the United States), is an opportunity for ambitious junior politicians to score points, raise their profile and maybe get their name in the Manchester Evening News. Given Labour’s not-quite-yet absolute stranglehold, it can only be thus.

In January this year, Professor Kevin Anderson gave a presentation on climate change to them all. That’s all safely forgotten now though, as the very expensive toy-train set that is HS2 got almost an hour’s worth of advertorial.

Then, around 11ish, after declarations of interest, it was down to business. And the business that we had come for was the signing off of the “Clean and Green [sic] Places” initiative. This is £14.5 million pounds of airport windfall money that the Council COULD consult on how to spend. Instead they’ve dreamed up (on two sides of A4) a very loosely-defined scheme that will enable money to be disbursed to interested groups without too many hoops being jumped through. (And one of their own ideas is “smart bins” that send a text message to the street cleaner saying “I’m full, come and empty me.”) Anyone would think there were council elections coming up, eh?

There was almost no discussion at all of this item, such is the speed and size of the red rubberstamp. Councillor Mary Di Mauro (Lib Dem, Northenden) had had her hand up to speak about the motion, but the Mayor seemed not to have seen her and the motion was “agreed.” After a few moments confusion and conferring on the top table, she was allowed to speak.
She said that the windfall was a tremendous opportunity to consult and engage, and that the failure to consult was a glaring example of of decision-making taking place in secret, behind close-doors. Where, she asked, was the accountability, the scrutiny.
She cited ward co-ordination and the cash-grant system as modes by which the Council could have engaged citizens, and found the “different priorities in different wards.” She pointed to Northenden, (her ward, where she will be trying to hold onto her seat in May next year) as an example of where local activists would want to keep their library open.

The most jeering (including a highly-excited Councillor Karney on his feet, pointing his finger!) came when Councillor Di Mauro suggested that this was “an opportunity to consult, engage and make yourselves more popular.”

Now, no doubt the more, um, tribal, Labour councillors would simply say that they were reacting with derision to a lecture on popularity from a Liberal Democrat. After all, since Nick Clegg decided to trade his credibility for a limo in 2010, no Liberal Democrat has come within a hundred gazillion miles of holding on to a Council seat in Manchester. Oblivion for all who tried.

The more nuanced and far-sighted councillors (2) , the ones who have read their Freud, might wonder if the strength of the anger was the sign that the Liberal Democrat had struck a nerve, had said something that councillors don’t want to admit, especially to themselves. These councillors would move beyond the fact that Labour have 86 of the 96 seats, and in all likelihood all 96 after next May. They would remind themselves that these elections are often won on a derisory turnout, and are anyway largely a referendum on national issues (those with longer memories will remember the beating that Labour took in Manchester after the invasion of Iraq in 2003).
They will factor in the anger and resentment and understandable cynicism that non-voters have towards the political classes and the Punch-and-Judy on display today.
Some of them might even realise that in five or ten years time, when they are running the show, their credibility and “soft power” will be diminished by the sorts of cack-handed and high-handed decisions being made now…
They would perhaps even go so far as to read Angela Eagle MPs fine words in her recent speech “Building a Better Politics” about re-engaging and reconnecting with citizens. But they will not, as yet, stand out and be counted in public.

But I digress; as did Council Leader Richard Leese, in his response. He gave some entirely predictable responses (3), including the ‘we are having to close libraries because of the unfair burden of cuts by the Conservative/Liberal Democrat government’ line. He also claimed that the idea “came from the people” and the “councillors.” This is very interesting and not quite perhaps what a constituency Labour Party in the south of the city might entirely agree with. Still, the Labour councillors who were against the idea at Labour Group on September 10th (and since) showed their customary (not to say admirable) discipline in keeping poker faces in public. The outbreak of potential-democracy was, sadly, still-born.

Next stop? The Ask the People of Manchester campaign will continue, trying to get 4,000 signatures by Monday 18th November, and so cause a debate in the next full council on Wednesday 4th December on however much of the money has not been disbursed. You can sign the petition here, if you’ve not already signed it. To be eligible you have to live, work or study within the boundaries of Manchester City Council…

Marc Hudson
mcmonthly@gmail.com

Footnotes
(1) At the beginning we followed councillors up the stairs and into the extension. We were then told that we actually had to go downstairs and through the extension (even though we could much more easily have walked along the hallowed ground to the back of the chamber then up a flight of stairs).
So down we went, accompanied by a helpful member of Council staff. When we got to the glass doors of the extension opposite, a tall G4S guy (beard, shaven head) told her that we would all have to sign in. So we were trooped along a corridor, where she investigated further.
We didn’t, in fact, have to sign in, and made it up to the public gallery after a total delay of about 10 mins.
This would have been TREMENDOUSLY intimidating and disheartening to a “normal” member of the public, or anyone on their own.
What is G4S told about full council and people’s right to attend? Is it part of their morning briefing on those days? We shall find out…
(2) They do exist. They tend not to be the ones who leave comments on the Manchester Climate Monthly blog, but they do exist. I’ve even had some civil and constructive conversations with some of them!!
(3) saying that the Lib Dems say one thing in the press and one thing in the Council chamber. This is curious, given that Richard Leese has had occasion to berate the Manchester Evening News in the past. Surely he does not believe everything he reads there? I asked Councillor Simon Wheale about the same allegation made at Executive on September 11th.
And Councillor Nigel Murphy, the Exec for the Environment said that the Lib Dems say one thing in the press and another in Executive in relation to this matter. What do you think he meant, and what’s your response?
[Laughs] I’ve absolutely no idea what he meant, because everybody’s been saying exactly the same thing, which is that the community should drive this process….”

Advertisements

About manchesterclimatemonthly

Was print format from 2012 to 13. Now web only. All things climate and resilience in (Greater) Manchester.
This entry was posted in Democratic deficit, Manchester City Council and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Full Council of despair – #Manchester City Council in business-as-normal mode

  1. gille liath says:

    Isn’t HS2 a good idea? If we want people to stop taking planes for journeys of a couple of hundred miles, rail needs to be upgraded.

  2. Erm, I am suspicious of this enormous infrastructure project for all the standard reasons. I don’t think anyone says that this is about stopping people taking domestic flights, either… I think a) there is a big opportunity cost and b) the blog post is about something else.
    Would MCFly ever host an HS2 debate? Maybe. But probably not, since it’s not really our remit.

    • gille liath says:

      Not looking for a debate: you raised the issue (albeit in passing).

      Whatever else it is, it’s clearly about improving and increasing the capacity of our terrestrial public transport system. Given that people are not just going to stop travelling, I think anyone who is bothered about carbon emissions should welcome that.

      • gille liath says:

        PS And it’s surely as relevant to environmentalism vis a vis Manchester as anything else. As, say, reviews of books published in the 1970s.

  3. Issy says:

    HS2 isn’t an upgrade, it’s a complete new build. Money would be better spent on upgrading what is already there.
    Re: Manchester LibDems -my 30 years of dealing with them is that they say different things to different people. Okay, this sort of thing is not exclusive to LibDems, but I once saw one LibDem councillor tell one group of residents that some trees should be felled, only to agree a few moments later with another group of residents that they should not!

    • I think there should be a medal (equivalent to the Victoria Cross) for ANYONE who has dealings with local councillors (be they red, green, blue, yellow whatever) for 30 years!!!

    • gille liath says:

      I said it’s an upgrade of the *system*.

      • Issy says:

        I know what you said, I was just clarifying that it is not upgrading what already exists, but building brand new, which isn’t necessary. Please don’t respond, I’m not trying to have an argument, even if you are!

  4. H2S will not stop people flying from Manchester to London, because flying is cheaper than rail. H2S will be even more expensive than traveling on Virgin’s West Coast rail line. High Speed rail is for longer distances, than the length of Britain and does not make economical sense. The better option would be to improve the Midland-Mainline route. This route operated quite successfully during Virgin’s West Coast rail lines, half-hearted modernisation, which stopped short of Stockport. As for capacity, Virgins trains are 8 carriages long, with 4 being 1st class only. During British Rails time, they were 12 carriages long and stopped at more stations.

  5. I agree that it is diff. to see HS2 as much more than a vanity toy to be ridden on by those who don’t buy their own tickets (but a useful link in the connection to Westminster), but perhaps I am biased as there is the issue of the rising tunnel within 50 yards of my house! On a more serious note, I had a warm expression of sympathy and concern by Cllr. Kate Chappell… but perhaps when it comes to dealing with the junta, even if they do get it councillors see the “bigger picture”!

    I guess there will be an even lower turn-out until the Greens get some more recognisable candidates or more people take up spoiling ones vote as an option.

    A luta continua!

  6. Dave Bishop says:

    Viva la Revolution!!!

    It’ll be along soon!!

    Errrmm … Until then, let them eat cake! … Although they don’t get a choice of cake … eeerrrmmm … ??

  7. gpheby says:

    Sir Richard Leese’s claim that the ‘Clean and Green’ spending of our money idea came from the people is a lie – and from councillors needs qualifying to a couple of councillors.
    On HS2 I wonder if it just leads to Manchester becoming part of Londons commuter belt and if the money would be less and better spent in upgrading rail between northern cities.

  8. gille liath says:

    I don’t profess to know the merits of different rail schemes, and I don’t know whether anyone here does; but I find it a little depressing that everyone seems to be against it, not really from any substantial objection but ‘just because’. If you agree that improving public transport is a necessary part of reducing carbon emissions from transport, this is the proposal. Sometimes if you *really* want change, you have to take what’s on offer.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s