Below is a statement released by Manchester Friends of the Earth on 10th December. It’s long, and complicated, and exactly the sort of vital work that is needed to stop councils and planners making completely ridiculous decisions. If you care about the future of this city and you have spare time, energy or cash, there are worse places to direct it than Manchester Friends of the Earth.
Concerns with Metrolink tram routes: Statement to Manchester Cycle Forum
On Thursday 4th December 2014, cycle forum members were invited to a briefing meeting to look at the proposed signage for the ‘cycling provision’ at the Southmoor Road / Altrincham Road junction in Wythenshawe which has already been built as part of the Metrolink route to the Airport.
This was the first time that any of the cycling organisations had seen the actual designs which have already been installed. Love Your Bike was dismayed at the designs and is seriously concerned that Metrolink have made the road junction less safe for cycling and have also installed a so-called ‘safe alternative’ that is not easy, convenient or intuitive to use.
Love Your Bike helped co-ordinate a response from a range of Greater Manchester cycling organisations which was presented to the Manchester Cycle Forum on 9th December and to Manchester City Council, Transport for Greater Manchester and Metrolink.
The Statement text is shown below. If you would like to add your support for the statement please email us your name and location (e.g. Wythenshawe, Bolton etc) and details of any organisation (that you represent) to gmloveyourbike@gmail.com
We would also like to hear about people’s experience of cycling along/across tram tracks in Greater Manchester. Please send details of your experience (good or bad) to gmloveyourbike@gmail.com
The following photographs and diagram highlight some of our concerns with the junction design.
The diagram to the left shows the layout of the Southmoor Road – Altrincham Road junction and Metrolink route to/from Manchester Airport that has been installed.
The green line shows the so-called ‘safe alternative’ route that people wishing to cycle from Southmoor Road to Moor Road (or the other way) are supposed to take. This route crosses 7 Toucan island crossings.
Anyone wishing to cycle from Southmoor Road across Altrincham Road (from bottom of diagram to top) will be sandwiched between a left turning lane with only 1.2 metres from the white line separating the traffic lane and the first tram line.
Once across the traffic light junction you will then need to cross at a shallow angle the tram lines as they go off to the left and the traffic lanes veer to the right.
If you are attempting to cycle the other direction from Moor Road (top to bottom of layout diagram) the pavement buildout at the top of Southmoor Road will force you (and all the other traffic) out towards the tram lines.
You may then have to pass between a bus parked in the bus stop, a tram line and 2 lanes of traffic trying to merge into one lane behind you. Good luck!
According to Metrolink, people wishing to cycle across this junction should use the ‘safe alternative’ (see the green route marked on the layout diagram). At approx 8.15am on a weekday morning it took 5 mins and 20 seconds to cycle aong this route – from Southmoor Road (bottom of diagram to top) to Moor Road the other side of Altrincham Road.
In addition, two of the Toucan islands are not wide enough to safely accommodate a bicycle and child trailer/buggy.
Love Your Bike believes that cycling provision that is not easy & convenient to use and is not intuitive to understand will not be used by many of the people who choose to cycle and therefore does not provide a “safe alternative”.
It is hard not to agree with the claim from Shane Sutton (previous British Cycling coach) that tram lines around Manchester are “death traps”.
Statement text: The Manchester Cycle Forum meeting of 9th December 2014:
1) Notes the serious concerns raised by British Cycling in November 2012 on the new tram lines around the Manchester Velodrome [1] and previous concerns raised by a Manchester Wheelers member in 2010 regarding the Eccles New Road route. [2]
2) Also notes that many Manchester residents already use cycle routes through Trafford Park and to Media City and that funding has been secured to build the Trafford Park Metrolink line.
3) Is dismayed that despite raising concerns over the design and provision of cycling provision alongside Metrolink routes that yet again inconvenient and, in some cases, unsafe cycling provision has again been installed on the Metrolink extension routes. Notably, the Altrincham Road / Southmoor Road junction on the Metrolink Airport route
4) Calls on Transport for Greater Manchester, Metrolink and its project contractors to ensure that:
a) remedial measures are taken to improve the cycling infrastructure provision along existing Metrolink routes;
b) future Metrolink routes, such as Trafford Park, must be designed to meet the TfGM Cycle Design guidance which outlines the 5 key criteria “for successful and effective cycling infrastructure”, namely: safety, coherence, directness, attractiveness and comfort.
c) the cycling organisations in Greater Manchester are involved from the beginning of the design process.
This statement is supported by the organisations listed below:
British Cycling, Martin Key
CTC Right to Ride, Dave Butler
GM Cycling Campaign, Jonathan Fingland
Love Your Bike, Dr Graeme Sherriff
Manchester Cycling Lab / The University of Manchester, Gabriele Schliwa
Sustrans, Rosslyn Coldersley, Regional Director
UMBUG, Kathy England
Notes
[1] Olympic coach Shane Sutton, badly hurt in bike crash, says tram lines around Manchester Velodrome are ‘death trap’ for cyclists. Manchester Evening News.
[2] Is this Dangerous? (Eccles New Rd in Salford) Manchester Wheelers.
– See more at: http://www.manchesterfoe.org.uk/concerns-with-metrolink-tram-routes-statement-to-manchester-cycle-forum/#sthash.LchHy6IA.dpuf
Good luck with that, then, you’re asking Manchester City Councillors to consult people with expertise. My personal experience is that they would rather ignore advice and get it wrong.
Ian – *exactly* what you say. If they admit they need genuine expert advice on issue x, that creates a REAL problem for them, in that they’ve inadvertently established a precedent about issue y. Pretty soon and their bureaucrats would not be able to offer them stupid but “profitable and easy option A” or “profitable but stupid option B”…