Off-topic video: “Dialectic Issue LifeCycle Model” for beginners #theory #socialchange #statusquo starring #Manchester Uni academic

Here’s a video about the “Dialectic Issue LifeCycle Model”.  What’s that, you ask?  Well, in (very) crude terms – it’s about how some problems get onto the public and political radar, and how others don’t.  “Dialectic” is an academic word meaning “discussion/debate/struggle.”  So, fossil fuel companies – to pick an example entirely at random – might try to delay action on cutting carbon dioxide emissions.  Theoretically…

The video stars Professor Frank Geels of the Sustainable Consumption Institute at University of Manchester. Here’s an account of a seminar he did last year called “The arduous transition to low carbon energy” . It also stars Caetano Penna, one of his PhD supervisees, who co-developed the “DILC.”

 

UPDATE 26th April : Someone I sent it to wrote back-

“… I am a bit uncomfortable with the underlying assumption that time unfolds in a linear fashion. Problems go through defined stages according to this model. Is that true? We can develop these simplistic, evolutionary narratives of change with historic case studies but I think change is much messier and contingent. Is there the potential for a problem to skip a stage or develop a new stage or hybridise multiple stages? And there is a significant emphasis on the social without any acknowledgement of nonhumans and the role of space and place. I think it is more useful to think about how change happens through iterative, cyclical, hybrid, and situated processes. Change is a much more complex process than is presented here. The downside of this perspective is that it is much harder to articulate and doesn’t provide any constructive modes of action.”

I replied (I paraphrase) “Thanks! Some caveats (esp re linearity/potential “stuck”/oscillating between stages) got left on the cutting room floor to keep the narrative tight – it’s a 5 minute video, not a 3 year PhD”.  That was probably a) self-serving and b) unduly defensive?  Fwiw, I think the folks who came up with the DILC (not me!) are aware of most (all?) of those points, but they certainly need to be raised. The model (and it’s a model, not a theory) is young, it needs helpful pokes like this, and therefore I’m dead grateful!

Posted in academia, youtubes | Leave a comment

Upcoming Event: Feeding #Manchester 15, Thurs 24th April 6.30pm

FeedingManchester 15 will be social/networking one – to reward all your hard work developing the Sustainable Food Charter/Vision at the last two events.

We have hired the room above the Briton’s Protection Pub, 50 Great Bridgewater St, Manchester M1 5LE on Thursday 24th April from 6.30 – 8.30.

We will also use it as the opportunity to launch a Greater Manchester Sustainable Food Charter – so come along and have a look at the results of your hard work!

We ask that you to register as there is a limit on the number of people we can get in there and because we want to know how much food to get in. There will be a small charge (£2) to cover the costs of a bit of food.

Please register by Friday 18th at noon by emailing: mail@kindling.org.uk

We look forward to seeing you for an evening of networking, finding out what each other have been up to and what exciting sustainable food plans are afoot!

All the best,

Helen Woodcock

On behalf of The Kindling Trust.

www.kindling.org.uk

Posted in Food, Upcoming Events | Leave a comment

#Manchester #climate steering group now bewilderingly incompetent … on Twitter

The high-profile and high-impact Steering Group for the Manchester Climate Change Action Plan has set up a Twitter account on January 17th. They managed a “hello look at us” tweet, a retweet and one twet on January 23rd. Since then, nowt.

macftwitterfeed

 

And here was me thinking Twitter was fool-proof.  It seems nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently determined and talented …

Oh, look, how hard can it be? You agree to set up a twitter account (good move – about 4 years overdue – apparently there weren’t any communications experts involved with the Steering Group back in the day).  You follow a bunch of people – some of them will follow back.  You even mention it during your dreadful “networking event.”

Oh, and you, um, you know, tweet, occasionally.  140 characters at a time. It ain’t War and Peace.

But no, it all seems to have been too difficult.

This is heart-breakingly incompetent.

Can someone please answer me any of the following questions –

a) If the Steering Group won’t take on the challenge of getting more signatories and more implementation plans, what is it for?

b) If the Steering Group won’t even mention the “low carbon culture” element of the Climate Change Action Plan in its twitter description, what is it for? What does that say about the status of goal two?

c) If the Steering Group can’t even organise a decent twitter account, what is it for?  Why should anyone take its organisational and motivational “capacity”  seriously?

The SG’s credibility is in tatters.  When will someone do the decent thing and put it out of its own misery, (and that of the five or ten people in Manchester who are paying any attention?)  The Low Carbon Hub is every bit as opaque, undemocratic and uninterested in issues of “low carbon culture”. But at least it has a Greater Manchester remit.  Let’s just have one futile joke overseeing this whole tawdry nonsense, shall we?

 

Pre-emptive disclaimer: Yes, MCFly has started and abandoned projects.  But we have no secretariat (£10,000. For what exactly?),  and we don’t have 31 (or more lately, fewer) “high-powered” people sat around as potential “doers” either.

 

Update– MCFly sent these questions to the chair of the Steering Group

On Monday, could you organise a statement please?

Hi Gavin,
can we have – for publication – answers to the following?
1. When was the decision to set up a Twitter account made?
1a.  Were any targets set for how many followers it would have by date x or y, how many tweets sent out per month (presumably a number great than zero per month – which is what happened in February and March).

2. Who is responsible for running the twitter account?

3. Why was the “low carbon culture” element of the Climate Plan not included in the description on twitter?
3a.  What does the word “dedicated” mean in the twitter description, given that the Steering Group has decided it doesn’t have the authority/resources/motivation to try to get more signatories/implementation plans?  i.e., how is the SG expecting this 41% reduction to actually happen?
4. Why have there been no tweets since January 23rd

5. Is the account going to continue or be abandoned?

5a. If it is going to continue, how often do you expect tweets to happen?

6. Anything else you want to say on the Steering Group’s social media “strategy”.

Marc

And got this back pretty quickly –

“Apologies for prefacing all these sorts of e-mails with an ‘as you know’ but here goes:

“As you know we’re in the process of updating all aspects of MACF including communications. The communications & events team(s) have been asked to develop a comprehensive ‘joined up’ communications & events strategy including ’embracing social media’ (at this point I can hear you laughing, loudly). The Twitter feed is a ‘Beta Version’ which was set up in response to this challenge. The communications & events strategy is being developed at the moment – which is why the Twitter feed is presently ‘on hold’ – but will be re-launched in the near future.

“Trust that explains it?”

MCFly- “Beta version?” Well, close, insofar as almost anything would have been a betta version. Surely the point of testing in beta is you fail fast, fail often and learn iteratively. What can possibly be learnt from that “beta”???

Posted in Climate Change Action Plan, Democratic deficit, Steering Group | Leave a comment

Off-topic – “Activist Fictions” article in Peace News

The article below appeared in the latest issue of the essential-reading “Peace News.” (subscribe here.)

Activist Fictions

The absurdly handsome activist bit his lip. The Peace News crew were threatening mil-itary action if the final extended deadline for a 2000 word essay on “Activism and Fiction” was missed. The clock was most definitely two minutes to midnight.
He sighed, ran a hand through his thick shoulder-length blond hair, and thought quickly. His hands flew with perfect acuracy across the keyboard. “The four books under review, all by women, are useful and…”

beeeep.

His 5th generation phone, full of apps about buying fair trade, challenging climate denialism, and the daily homily on intersectionality, beckoned.
He considered not answering. It was probably just Sven again, pestering him to come to Stockholm in December to accept that stupid prize. Or else Noam wanting more help with his grammar homework.
He picked up the phone and read the text.

“Why u writing stupid article? Activists shld be out saving world, not reading poxy made-up crap. U enabling their laziness, u moron.”

The deadline be damned! “Who is this? How u get this number?!!”

Straight away the reply: “Well duh, numbskull. I’m your conscience. Call me Jiminy, or Mr Puritan. Or whatevs. U gonna justify yrself? Y u rite abt novels? Real life 2 scary?”

He buried his head in his hands. That’s all he needed – the fourth wall to break down. He’d been warned that if the article wasn’t in the PN inbox by Monday to expect a visit from some very large and short-tempered quakers. Still, he could hardly ignore himself, could he?

He texted back. “Switching to email.” And he wrote

“There are at least three excellent reasons we activists should read fiction about activism.
First, we need to get ideas and inspiration – and heed warnings – from other people’s struggles. Novels can say things about personal and group experiences that articles and non-fiction can’t.
Secondly, you cannot spend your whole life reading local authority plans and corporate responsibility reports and Amnesty International appeals. Or rather, you can, but you’ll burn yourself to a crisp and become so narrow and boring that you are a perfect advert for NOT being an activist.
Thirdly, if the novel is good, you can share it not just with your activist mates, but also with other people who don’t understand what you’re doing, or why you’re doing it. It might inspire them to get involved.

The text response was instant. “#Yrsofullofit. Take your first choice – “Mud” by Nicky Edwards. Written almost 30 yrs ago, and full of stuff about World War One! Er, relevant?!”

The activist first thought ‘don’t feed the troll’, then realised he was the troll. He typed: “It’s a brilliant novel. A young woman who has fallen out of love with the intense activism of the Greenham Common protests meets an elderly woman called Ada whose life she wants to write about. This allows Edwards to write about so much that matters; suffragettes, the personal politics of meetings and communal living, history, memory, the trouble with the trajectories of protest, class and the scars of war. Because it’s the only British novel in the four I’ve chosen, it’s the one I’d try to get everyone to read first. Catch this bit, in which the activist explains the end of the affair –

“OK. Once upon a time there was this big day out at a peace camp, when Janet and Janet and some Johns, but mainly thirty thousand or so Janets went and held hands and sang songs and generally had a good time.”
“…. Lots of adventures for the Janets. But time passes, until it’s a year after that first day out in the country, which so many of our heroines found so inspiring. Almost exactly a year to the day…. Well, our particularly Janet is there, of course, older and a bit more battered and generally fed up to the back teeth with being pushed around in the good cause that has brought everyone out in their thermal underwear again.”
“But still she went.”
“Couldn’t miss it really. Big day out, lots of women there, sense of obligation, not wanting to be left out. All sorts of things.”
“And how was it different from the first time?” Ada was really quite good at this cross-examining business.
“In many ways, not at all. Same thousands of women milling around, looking pretty similar, singing the same song. Same mud, same camera crews, same tail-back of coaches with posters in the windows jamming the Basingstoke road. More police helicopters, more barbed wire, more soldiers and watchtowers and floodlights and guns in evidence. More crackle of walkie-talkies filling up every bit of the airwaves, even the ones the Janets were trying to sing in. But a lot of the same looks on their faces. Untroubled.”
“And?”
“Like I said, our particular Janet was wandering around feeling rather jaded, and wondering why they all thought the nastiness would go away because they’d turned out in such numbers to be nice all round it, when they’d done the same thing last year and not changed it for the better.”
Ada tutted gently to herself. Not sure how to interpret the noise, I carried on.
“And, of course, Janet felt guilty for being so cynical and making comparisons with the way she always got taken to midnight mass when she went home for Christmas, a pleasant and colourful, but fairly pointless annual ritual.”
page 123

“Great – so u want people to slag off activism now? That’ll really work! (claps).”

The Brad Pitt-lookalike sighed and typed. “No, not slag off, just understand the mechanisms that can lead us astray. It’s easier to do with fiction than impassioned denunciations of the smugosphere. I think. But the other novels are brilliant too! In “Vida” Marge Piercy explains the enormous personal and political costs of being underground after the 60s. Vida and friends were entrapped by an undercover cop (sound familiar) but got away. There’s brilliant stuff about the politics of the Vietnam War movement, the radicalism, the tensions within it. This bit, on burnout, is just perfect.

“She was always late now- running, running, but never arriving. She never went to bed before three in the morning, and she was seldom allowed to sleep past eight. From the time she crawled out till she collapsed in her clothes, she no longer had time to read a book, bake a cake, listen to music, talk idly- and everything was empty palaver that was not about liberation, not about imperialism or racism or Third World struggles, about the war, the war, the war. If she went to the country, it was for a secret meeting or for target practice. When she ran into an old friend, she could think only what skills or contacts they had that were needed, what kind of speaking or fund raising or organising or liaison work they could do. Yet she had no feeling of accomplishment, because every morning in the Times, every evening on television, the war was stronger, and she was closer to exhaustion. They had not done enough they had not risked enough, they had not tried everything, they had not fought hard enough, they had not, because the proof was before her every morning and every evening the war went on. It was raining blood outside whether she looked out the window or not; the blood was splattering down, and the hot wind that blew across the city smelled of ashes, of burning flesh. Obviously they had not tried hard enough if the war still went on.”

“So you get vicarious thrills from wannabe revolutionaries? Really? Weak.”

This Mr Puritan guy was getting tiresome. The activist typed “No, but I can learn from them, no? In the same way I learn from corporate literature of team-building and strategy? And from military techniques for tactics and training? Why not learn from things you don’t agree with? And Piercy isn’t saying Vida is a heroine, just that she’s a human, who has made smart and dumb choices, and sometimes not had space to make choices. The final pages of the book leave me breathless every time I read it.”

“Yeah yeah. What were the other two then?”

“Death is Part of the Process” by Hilda Bernstein. Written during the armed struggle against the Apartheid regime, covering both the 80s but and the 60s, it follows the fates of three different activists – one white, one Indian and one black. It looks at how they are treated differently by the state, how they have different options and how they do – or don’t break – under pressure, what they expect of themselves and others. Again, you will tell me this has nothing to teach about activism in the privileged West. But you’re wrong. And it’s wonderfully written. The scene where one activist has to decide if he stays in the struggle or heads for the door, by simply tearing off a button has stayed with me for 20 years. And then there’s the hardest to find, but in some ways the best. “Local Deities” by Agnes Bushell. Like “Vida”, it deals with the costs of living underground in the United States, and being hunted by all. It’s excellent on race and class too, full of vivid characters who you want to know more about. And, like Vida, it warns against turning anyone into heroes – thus the title.”

“Okay,so this last one – how’d you hear about it if it’s so hard to find?”

The activist wondered if he was winning anyone – least of all his conscience – over. And glanced at the clock. He was almost out of time. He typed. “Well, I read Jennifer Egan‘s “The Invisible Circus”, about a casualty of the 1960s, and checking the Amazon reviews afterwards

“Amazon? And you call yourself a…”

“Chill, I didn’t buy anything! I found mention of Dana Spiotta‘s excellent “Eat the Document” (also on the consequences of violent action for both victims and perpetrators) and a reviewer – rightly – recommended Bushell.

“You done preening yet?”

The activist hit the properties function, and wrote “Still got 300 words. You gonna help?”

“U only wanna write about women? Trying 2 prove non-existent feminist credentials? #shallow, dude.”

The activist grinned. “Men often more into the whole street-fighting thing. But also excellent stuff too. Zodiac by Neal Stephenson, before his books got enormous. Good on the technicalities of nvda sabotage. Edward Abbey’s “The Monkey Wrench Gang”, if you can cope with the casual misogyny, is full of verve and love.
Ender’s Game by Orson Scott Card is excellent on strategy and the need for constant re-invention. Just pretend you don’t know about the author’s horrible homophobia, ‘kay?
Cory Doctorow‘s recent Little Brother and Homeland – both set in San Francisco after a terrorist attack, are simply brilliant – great stuff on pleasure, technology, surveillance, courage and politics, with a narrative drive that has you almost devouring the damn books. They deserve a 2000 word review all of their own.”

“Sounds a bit sci-fi. I’ll pass” texted Jiminy, clearly on the back foot.

The activist looked at the clock too. He was winning on both fronts. “Your loss. And sci-fi? How is that a dirty word?? Two must-read trouble-in-utopia novels get that slurred as “sci-fi” should be on the national curriculum. “Woman on the Edge of Time” by the aforementioned Marge Piercy and “The Dispossessed” by Ursula Le Guin. Nobody can call themselves an informed anarchist without having read both, imho. And Le Guin’s short story “The Day before the Revolution” is a brilliant evocation of the cruelty and pleasure of fighting for justice without expecting the day to come.”

“Oh just write the damn article and leave me alone.”

The activist checked his phone. Yep, Sven again. And from Noam four more pleading emails. Time to send this off to Peace News. Activism and fiction indeed.
Disclaimer: Marc Hudson has been called absurd, but never absurdly good-looking. All adverbs and adjectives used in this article should be treated as fiction. And some of the facts. But not the assessment of the novels discussed. Those are good old-fashioned opinions.

Posted in Book Review | Leave a comment

Hitler learns climate change accelerating and unstoppable. Contains NSFW language…

Found this on the interwebs.  Hitler develops a potty mouth as the clip continues…

Posted in humour | Leave a comment

Job Alert: “Campaigns and Outreach officer for “the #Climate Coalition”

The utterly useless Stop Climate Chaos is dead! Long live the “Climate Coalition.”
And maybe the first thing the new Campaigns and Outreach” officer can campaign for is a less vomit-inducing logo/icon/whatever-you-want-to-call-the-atrocity…
climatecoalition
Oh, and there’s an Online Comms job, but applications close tomorrow, probably before you read this…

Join the team as a Campaigns and Outreach Officer

Coalition Campaigns and Outreach Officer (full time)

From 2014, The Climate Coalition (previously Stop Climate Chaos) is scaling up its campaigns and launching new joint work to match the importance of the political decisions on the horizon. The campaigns and outreach officer will be a key part of the team, responsible for engaging and consulting coalition members and supporting the delivery of the campaign.

Apply by: 10am Wednesday 16th April

Overall purpose of the job:

Take a leading role in delivering the Coalition campaign, with responsibility for working with the wider coalition. Support single issue campaign coordination and activities.

Be responsible for ensuring the full coalition is represented in planning and campaigns. Hold relationships with coalition members and support their engagement, organise coalition meetings and manage coalition communications.

Support promotion of coalition and member organisation campaigns via social media networks, prepare promotional and outreach material for distribution and support delivery of key moments.

Download a full job description and personal specification:

Coalition campaigns and outreach officer.doc

Based in: London, Victoria

Salary: £30,000 p/a

Post details:
– Full time, on a two-year contract.
– Our preference is for a candidate who can start immediately but this is not a condition.

To apply:
Please send a completed application form and completed equal opportunities form to jobs@stopclimatechaos.org
stating Campaigns and Outreach officer in the subject, by 10am on 16th April.

Application form: Campaigns-Outreach-Application-form.doc
Equal opportunities form: EO-Form.doc
Full Job Description: Coalition campaigns and outreach officer.doc

Posted in Job Alert | 1 Comment

#Manchester citizens answer 3 questions – 014 Jennie Bailey #3qthurs

This week, Jennie Bailey.

1. “Who are you?”  (Name, where you live, and – if you want to say – what you “do”)
2. “What does Manchester need to become more sustainable?”
3. “What knowledge and skills do you want to acquire in 2014?”

Why this? Because we need to celebrate what is happening, imagine what could happen and also connect people who have skills with people who want them.  #movementbuilding.

So, watch out. If I see you before you see me, and I’ve got my video camera handy (I will), you might be in the frame…

* And an optional 4. –  “Anything else you’d like to say?”

Posted in 3 question Thursday | 2 Comments

New garden tool libraries launching in South #Manchester to mark National Gardening Week, 14–20 April

Below is a press release from the folks at Eat Green (UK)

Range of gardening tools will be available for free hire in Burnage and Didsbury

Eat Green (UK) is delighted to launch two new garden tool libraries in South Manchester. The first will be located at Westcroft Community Centre, 24–26 Westcroft Road in Burnage.

It is launching in time for National Gardening Week – the country’s biggest celebration of gardening, organised by the Royal Horticultural Society.

A second library is expected to follow in May, based at Didsbury Library. Both tool libraries will be equipped with a range of garden tools, from hand forks, trowels and secateurs through to larger items, such as spades, hoes, and shears. All tools can be borrowed for up to 3 weeks, free of charge. The tool library in Burnage will run on Fridays, 1:30-3:30pm, except public holidays, and the Didsbury tool library will be staffed during the library’s regular opening hours.

Says community gardener, Anna Builek, from Cheadle: “I personally think that ‘share’ will be the new ‘have’. The scheme gives people access to tools that they might struggle to buy a whole set of, or have limited space to store. Let’s be honest – my spade is most probably used for a month worth of digging, and then sits idly in the shed for another 11 months. It’s a great idea for using resources efficiently – very green. And who knows, it might create a synergy effect. If someone shared something with me, perhaps next time I might share something with others”.

Eat Green, which has provided the tools, aims to equip people with the skills needed to grow and cook meals from scratch. According to the National Society of Allotment and Leisure Gardeners, households could save around £1,300 per year by growing their own food – an amount that is only expected to rise in line with food prices.

20140401_121318Keen gardener Wahid Nasir from Fallowfield (pictured) comments: “Growing my own food means less shopping, saves me money, and encourages me to consume just enough to survive, rather than to overindulge in our culture of plenty. It’s brilliant to have the libraries there if I need any extra tools to help me with my garden.”

Eat Green also operates a local landshare scheme, linking people who want to grow their own fruit and veg to rent-free spaces where they can grow it. It currently has plots available in East Didsbury, Didsbury Village and Withington. Please contact Amanda Woodvine if you would like to find out more.

 

(For updates about Eat Green’s work, visit its Facebook page or follow @EatGreenUK on Twitter.

Eat Green also operates free 6-week ‘learn to cook’ classes in South Manchester. Priority places are allocated to people on low incomes with below average cookery skills. The next course will run on Mondays, 4–6pm from 28 April, at Westcroft Community Centre.)

Posted in Campaign Update, press release journalism, volunteer opportunity | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Capacity Building: “How to write an Event Report”

MCFly is supposed to give some coverage of what is going on , climate-wise, in Manchester.  Two things have made that more difficult;
a) the inexplicable departure last year of co-editor Arwa Aburawa. (1)
b) the explicable inability of the other co-editor to endure the same old dreadful meeting formats over and over and over again.

So, here below is the first of a new and occasional series of blog posts, modestly on the topic of “how to”.  Please suggest  topics (forthcoming ones will include ‘how to maintain close relationships with council officers and members’ and ‘how to give polite and implemented suggestions to Steering Groups’.)

Event reports
Don’t panic. An event report does NOT have to be a stunning work of literature/thinking. It is perfectly okay to give a straightforward account of what happened without offering any “original” insights.  That would put you at the novice level. (The Novice to Ninja thing is part of Activist Skills and Knowledge, a separate project…)

Novice level
You write a straightforward (largely chronological) account that covers the following-
Who organised the event?
What they were hoping to achieve
Who is the speaker/are the speakers?
Who turned up? How many people. Ratio of men to women, people of colour, old/young
What was said by the speaker(s)
What is happening next with this campaign?
How can people get involved?
There are a couple of basic hyperlinks

Practitioner level – (still “passive” and factual)
All the above
How was the Q and A handled – was it dominated by a few confident “usual suspects” or did other things happen?
What were the “best” questions and how were they answered?
What happened at the end (people went off to pub, lots of people left before the end etc)
If you like – how could the event have been improved
There are more hyperlinks

Expert Level
All the above and some killer quotes to hook people in at the outset, framing it not just as a largely chronological story but as either a newspaper or magazine story
You get some brief quotes from organisers and attendees to flesh out who thought what about the event and its effectiveness
You get some photos (with permission, of course!)
Lots and lots of relevant hyperlinks
What did and didn’t “work” in the meeting, and what could have been tried that wasn’t

Ninja level
All the above and also written with verve and accuracy and speed (e.g. goes up the next day).
It’s so vivid that in later years people swear they were actually there.
You point out how it could have been done better using the same space/time/money, and how the meeting compares to other campaigns and where the campaign seems to be where “up to” (in, say, the Movement Action Plan framework)

In any case, say who are you
Declare any interest you have – are you involved in the campaign/opposed to it/

NB – A “Ninja” isn’t always going to write at Ninja level – sometimes they’ll just want to do a novice report. There’s no point, often, in breaking a butterfly on t’wheel…

And, as with all Activist Skills and Knowledge dimensions, it is perfectly okay only to be interested in getting to “novice” level!  You do not have to want to become a ninja at anything…

Footnotes
(1) Why leave an unpaid and increasingly surreally repetitive drone gig with MCFly for a paid one in London with Al-Jazeera where they’re only going to teach you production, presenting, research and set you on a path to global media hegemony?  Weird.

Posted in capacity building | Leave a comment

#Manchester #climate boss Kate Chappell on cycling, the coming Great Car Debate and much else

Councillor Kate Chappell is the Manchester City Council’s Executive Member for the Environment.” Here’s an interview, conducted Tuesday 8th April,  that touches upon “highway bores” (a good thing), potholes (a bad thing), the coming debate on the role of the car in Manchester over the next 20 years (a metaphorically bloody thing), her not-quite-yet blog and that fracking-to-happen-in-Albert-Square story…

0mins 10 secs What’s been happening tonight and did you have a good time?

00 mins 25 secs what was the most awkward question and what was your answer?

1mins 15 In your speech you advocated becoming a “Highway Bore” – what do you mean by that and how can other people help you become a better highway bore?

2 mins 25 So I am in Crumpsall, or Rusholme, or Woodhouse Park and there’s a bloody pothole that the Council hasn’t been fixing. And I’ve watched this interview on Manchester Climate Monthly advocating I become a highway bore – now what do I do?

3 mins 10 secs. You also mentioned what can get a council’s attention, and I’m not sure if you’re aware of the case recently where a council did get sued because of a fatality – a cyclist hit a pothole and the judge finally decided recently the council was liable…
[GOT MY FACTS WRONG. #1sttimeever http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-26504065]

4 mins 55 At the end of your speech that we need a debate over the role of the car over the next 20 years. My question isn’t about what you would say in the debate but about what the mechanics of would be. Because obviously you don’t mean a one off debate in the Town Hall. Who would be the stakeholders? What sorts of ways would their opinions be canvassed, and who would make the decisions about what the role of the car is in Manchester?

6 mins 40 On the subject of blogs – where is yours up to?

7 mins 30 Anything else you’d like to say?

PS Apols to Ms Chappell for her looking “goofy” in the thumbnail. It was the least worst of the automated options Youtube gave me –
thumbnailsofkate

Posted in Interview, Manchester City Council, Transport | Tagged , | Leave a comment