#Manchester #climate rally – 8 out of 11 ain’t bad.

We are so doomed.

rallyoutcome

So, of the 11 hypotheses, I was right about 8 of them. I was definitely wrong about

  • the size (but not the demographic) of the audience,
  • the gender of the first questioners, and the
  • capacity of the chair to bring speakers in on time [a valuable skill!].

Random observations

  • The lack of a roving microphone seriously disenfranchised the elderly/hard of hearing, one of whom voted with her feet.
  • Rabble rousing is all well and good. But if you’re going to be on a stage, perhaps bludgeoning people with statistics isn’t the way to go? I looked around from my filming and a lot of people had a mask of apathy rather than a mask of anarchy.
  • Become a University of Manchester student you have been trained and trained yourself to think that there is One Right Answer. In this case learning to reflect, admit mistakes and failure [even if it wasn’t your fault!!], is not in the skill set. That’s not how you get to an ‘elite’ (god help us all) university. So is perhaps very unsurprising that people were incapable of hearing that a plea for learning and reflection is not the same as a plea for a time machine.
  • Conflating Corbymania and a climate movement is more delusional than I can stomach.
  • The Civil Rights movement didn’t start with [the totally awesome] Rosa Parks. It really really didn’t. FFS.
Advertisement

About manchesterclimatemonthly

Was print format from 2012 to 13. Now web only. All things climate and resilience in (Greater) Manchester.
This entry was posted in University of Manchester, Unsolicited advice. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s