Guest post “stopping the wind”; on nuclear, off-shore wind, the politics of self-destruction etc

This below is from “Bristling Badger,” who can be forgiven for living on wrong side of t’Penines, I guess.

 

The 2010 Coalition agreement spelt it out in clear terms.

Liberal Democrats have long opposed any new nuclear construction. Conservatives, by contrast, are committed to allowing the replacement of existing nuclear power stations… provided that they receive no public subsidy.

So, the most ardently pro-nuclear stance was one in which they were entirely privately funded. Liberal Democrats will oppose it nonetheless.

Two weeks ago Liberal Democrat Danny Alexander announced £10bn of public guarantees to investors in just one new nuclear power station, Hinkley Point.

This week the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) published a report on the smothering at birth of Britain’s offshore wind industry. With so much coastline and much of it relatively shallow, this country has an enviable position to establish  massive offshore wind infrastructure. It is much more expensive than building on land, but then it also avoids many of the problems such as spoilt landscapes. Additionally, out at sea you get greater production and efficiency as there aren’t the obstacles that create turbulence around turbines.

continues

Posted in Democratic deficit, Energy | Leave a comment

(International) Action: “Banks and pension funds in the UK are fuelling climate change”

We just got this from World Development Movement

wdmBanks and pension funds in the UK are fuelling climate change by pouring billions of pounds into dirty coal, oil and gas around the world. Only government regulation can make the finance sector quit fossil fuels – and to persuade the government to act, we need to keep the issue in the media.

Please email your local paper using our sample letter or your own words.

With money from UK banks, the Cerrejón coal mine in Colombia has wiped whole villages from the map. Coal dust has ruined the health and polluted the land of people remaining in the area. Dirty fossil fuel projects like Cerrejón destroy people’s lives as well as bringing us ever closer to climate catastrophe.

Last time we asked supporters to write to their local press – on food speculation – more than 50 letters were published in papers across the country. We think there’s a good chance local papers will also be keen to print your letters on financing for climate change. Please help us bring this urgent issue the attention it deserves.

Many thanks for your support,

Kirsty Wright
Senior climate campaigner, WDM

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

#food #technology #Manchester – “The transformative potential of gardening with data”

Reblogged from the Open Knowledge Foundation website.

The transformative potential of gardening with data

July 18, 2013 in Open Data

The following guest post is by Farida Vis from the Everyday Growing Cultures research project. The project looks at the potentially transformative effect of bringing together the food growing and open data communities.

Potatoes, everyday growing cultures

Those supporting the government’s open data agenda highlight the business case for open data, an economic argument about its moneysaving potential, along with the suggestion that it will lead to better-informed citizens. All of these claims require close and critical examination. If money is saved, who benefits and makes money from these innovations? How exactly do citizens know about and become better informed through open data? Why should they care? Some within the wide and heterogeneous open data ‘movement’ subsequently point to the importance of ‘really useful’ data, suggesting citizens might care and become better informed if open data was seen as useful in their daily lives.

Our project, “Everyday Growing Cultures”, addresses these issues by focusing on two distinct yet connected communities: allotment, growing communities (plot holders; allotment societies; those waiting for plots; allotment governing bodies) and the open data community (open data activists; developers; local government; data journalists). Allotment and open data communities may initially seem unconnected, but they share many concerns: around ideas of knowledge sharing, exchange, collaboration, ‘the commons’, and access to shared resources (digital and land).

We believe there is a potentially transformative value in connecting these two currently disparate communities. Bringing them together could build stronger, more active communities, benefit local economies and improve environmental sustainability and food security. We focus on the current allotment waiting list crisis and huge interest in growing your own, to investigate the value that could be brought into people’s lives through opening up local government data on allotments. Moreover, we are interested in facilitating citizen-led solutions to this crisis by identifying and mapping vacant land for the purpose of growing food.

Our research is based on the UK cities of Sheffield and Manchester, which both have thriving open data and food growing communities. Keeping in mind the different aspects of the open data agenda – the economic dimension, its claimed contribution to a better informed citizenry – along with the methods through which open data is practiced, we are using the allotment case and increased interest in food growing to ask:

  • What does digital engagement and transformation look like within these communities?
  • How can these communities further the national open data agenda so that it benefits citizens?
  • How can a more widely adopted and enacted open data strategy benefit local economies?
  • If unsuccessful in these aspects, what might open data’s unintended consequences look like?
  • How can we think of forms of resistance, mobilisation of local histories and heritage identities?
  • How can we rethink received ideas of participation and enacting citizenship in light of these?

Since mid-February 2013, in partnership with Open Data Manchester, The Kindling Trust and Grow Sheffield, we have run a number of events with growing communities in Manchester and Sheffield, to identify potential food growing spaces. We have talked to local councils about taking some of our ideas forward and how this might take place. We have requested allotment data through the Freedom of Information Act and looked at how council websites provide information to potential allotment plot holders. We are in the process of surveying people on waiting lists and have made a documentary film highlighting these important issues.

Join the Everyday Growing Cultures team in Sheffield on 23 July to discuss and explore these issues with key partners and stakeholders, including leading UK allotment expert Professor David Crouch. As part of the event, the award winning feature documentary, Grown in Detroit, will be screened. Before that our own project documentary film will be shown and the filmmakers (Erinma Ochu and Caroline Ward) will be there to answer your questions!

The event is free to attend, but registration is required. Please register here: Eventbrite information. Please check the website for further details.

We will also present work from the project at these upcoming events: Smart Towns event in Halifax in September. Everyday Growing Cultures film screening at Dig the City festival in Manchester (3-11 August).

– See more at: http://blog.okfn.org/2013/07/18/the-transformative-potential-of-gardening-with-data/#sthash.m9xpIULG.dpuf

Posted in Food | Leave a comment

#digthecitymcr on Twitter? The #Manchester #food revolution might be twitterised?!

MCFly has been asked to publicise the Dig the City thang, and its twitter conversations…

digthecity“I am contacting you from Dig the City, the North’s first Urban Gardening festival which takes place in August and aims to inspire and encourage Manchester residents to embrace city greening and growing. Extraordinary show gardens will be popping up in the unlikeliest of places – Manchester City Centre – as we transform the city into a natural wonderland of forests, horticulture, fine food, flowers and fêtes, markets, workshops, demonstrations, public art and more.

“To involve the green spirited in all things urban gardening, we will be launching a series of Twitter events each Thursday for 4 weeks, with the first event taking place on Thursday 18 July at 4pm and we very much hope you will join us and support the gardening fever with a tweet or two?

“For one hour, Dig the City (@digthecitymcr) will be discussing the topic of Urban Gardening with followers via Twitter using the hashtag #digthecitymcr.

“We hope you will join in the discussion and share tips, ideas and inspiration on city greening (town gardens, balconies, vertical planting etc.) and share photos from your own gardens or pictures of city gardening in action near you. We hope to highlight the significance of urban gardens to the environment and society.”

Posted in Food, Upcoming Events | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Green & Blue Infrastructure strategy AWOL again #Manchester City Council #epicfail

The same people who brought you the triumph of accuracy and clarity that was the Annual Carbon “Reduction” Plan for Manchester City Council are also supposed to be producing a “Green and Blue Infrastructure” plan. It’s been delayed almost as much as the GM “Climate Strategy Implementation Plan” was (i.e. a year). There seemed to be light at the end of the tunnel – it was due to go to Executive in July and then (!) to scrutiny in September. Apparently not, though. Read on and see the admirable speed with which some in Castle Greyskull are able to reply

Email sent on Weds 17th July: Dear [officer with responsibility for Executive],

I attended Full Council on Weds 10th July.  While responding to a motion put forward by the Liberal Democrats to “Save Withington Green” the Leader informed full council that a Green and Blue Infrastructure (GBI) plan was going to be presented at a scrutiny committee (Neighbourhoods) the following week.

I knew this was not the case, but assumed that the Leader was in fact thinking of the GBI coming to Executive on Weds 24th July.  I happened to know that it was on the  previous Key Decisions document for July, and I have looked just now at the Key Decisions document posted on 5th July. It is still listed for July.

Sadly, the item is not on the Agenda for Executive for Weds 24th July.

Has the item been removed/delayed? If so, why?

Many thanks

Marc Hudson

On the morning of Thurs 18th, we received this –

“Dear Mr Hudson

I understand the report is to be considered by the Neighbourhoods Scrutiny Committee and the Executive in September.”

So, everyone – date for your diary- Tuesday 3rd September. Probably a 12.30 start for the “pre-meeting”. Venue tbc…

Posted in Biodiversity, Democratic deficit, Manchester City Council, Upcoming Events | Leave a comment

Something to Dwelle on – interview with Ric Frankland about architecture and #Manchester

Vicki Ramsden spoke to Ric Frankland, the creator of the shed at the bottom of the garden of the Eastlands Homes towers, that is in fact a new concept of eco-building. [Interview conducted in February – the delay in posting it is entirely the fault* of MCFly co-editor Arwa Aburawa, who has been punished by being demoted from MCFly to Al-Jazeera.]

What is dwelle about?
A straight forward enough question but one when asked, Ric didn’t quite know where to begin. Because for architect Ric, he has come to realise that dwelle (or more precisely the “dwelle.ings”) are actually a product, and that he’s no longer offering just an architectural service. It’s also a way of life. Ric explains that there are so many different but interconnected aspects to dwelle that the ‘elevator pitch’ to describe what it’s all about, still eludes him.
As an architect with an interest in sustainability and a commitment to well-functioning building designs, Ric wanted to create something that was developed to a high quality but that incorporated excellent eco-friendly criteria. Ric shared with me his frustration with the building sector, the design process and the nature of the work that so often means there is not sufficient time to spend on one project to produce well detailed building designs. Also, with his keen interest in global environmental challenges, he believes that all new developments should incorporate much more environmental criteria as standard.

As the design for the eco-building developed, Ric has created a template that started initially as a house, but can be adapted for a wide range of uses such as small offices, classrooms or holiday homes.

RF-003

photo by Lorna Ruskin

When did you start / how long has the project been running?
The concept was developed almost 4 years ago, although it is only now that the first fully working prototype has been erected. Ric first exhibited the building design at Grand Designs Live in 2009 and it was the overwhelming positive response from the exhibit that gave him the confidence to persevere to develop the design. Through the process, Ric came to realise that he was no longer offering a traditional architectural service but a concept for living and a product.
Following the success of Grand Designs Live, Ric explained how the opportunity arose to exhibit the first fully working prototype at Greenbuild EXPO 2011 in Manchester. It is this prototype that can now been seen at its new home opposite Platt Fields Park, outside Eastlands Homes’ Platt Court on Wilmslow Road.

What’s been your biggest challenge – associated with dwelle?
Ric talks frankly about the struggles of working alone through a recession that has hit the building sector hard without being able to secure funds and therefore working on an extremely limited budget. Ric explains how the evolution of the concept led to a case of ‘catch 22’. Initially, what mystified Ric following all the positive feedback, was why he wasn’t receiving actual orders. As an architect, when you work on a project, you’re never able to show the end result until the project is complete. Ric came to realise that what he had created was a product, dwelle is the end result, so people expected to see it. So rather than offering an architectural service, Ric understood that he needed a way of letting people experience the concept for themselves, a bit like test driving a car, he says. So the main challenge was single-handedly and without funding getting to the point where he could show people a ‘dwelle.ing’.
But related to this was the challenge of working with a cast of other trades, and their notorious unreliability! Some of the frustrations and delays that Ric has had to contend with serve as an apt example of why he became so passionate about his creation in the first place. In his own words, like engineers building jet engines at Rolls Royce honing their craft for 30-40 years, Ric is passionate about traditional crafts; traditional skills which create products that are built to last.

What is your biggest achievement so far,related to dwelle)?
Given the challenges, the achievements could be listed as many but Ric simply says his biggest achievement is the building itself, built on a shoestring. And here it is. There to experience. There to marvel. And playing host to this interview!

And what next?
Finally having the first eco-home established and fully functioning, the ball is starting to roll. Ric is in dialogue with a company with the potential to order a quantity of buildings to be used as holiday homes. This leads Ric to his next challenge – of meeting the order!
Ric explains to me this challenge of meeting the order and trying to keep costs down whilst remaining resolute that there will be no compromise on the eco-credentials and the quality of the buildings. And true to his character, Ric has been able to sponsor a PhD student having eventually secured funding from the Centre for Global Eco-innovation
http://www.cgeinnovation.org/ supported by Lancaster University and the University of Liverpool. Ruth will assist in developing the design to maximise its environmental characteristics.

Ric goes on to clarify that the building will always have certain eco credentials as standard such as being air tight with extremely high insulation, mechanical ventilation with heat recovery, and a careful selection of sustainable materials. He wishes to incorporate others features such as solar PV panels and rain water harvesting in the standard specification.

If there could be involvement from others – who would they be and what would they do?
Always having a vision and looking ahead Ric responds that he’d like to develop the website and to build the business but both these require funding which just isn’t available currently. The big nut to crack as Ric has discovered now that people can visit the prototype, is the challenge around land availability and planning. The overwhelming response from visitors to the prototype is that people would love to dwell in a dwelle.ing. The homes cost around £75k, are mortgagable and are designed to meet building regulations; having a minimum lifespan of 60 years. But land availability which is linked with planning remains a hurdle to overcome.

Characteristically of Ric, he recognises that all of this has only come about from the support of different suppliers providing the components and materials free of charge. He didn’t want the opportunity to talk about dwelle without having the chance of directing readers to details of others without whose contributions, dwelle would not be possible, so for further information, please do visit:
http://www.dwelle..co.uk/dwelle._demonstration_project.pdf

* Actual facts may vary. Always read the label.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Newsflash: #Manchester council concedes emissions INCREASE

In a dramatic admission at Tuesday’s Neighbourhoods Scrutiny Committee, the elected member for responsibility for climate change action admitted that the Council’s emissions have increased.   Responding to a question based around Friends of the Earth’s submission to the committee, Councillor Nigel Murphy conceded that – contrary to a press release released by Manchester City Council – like-for-like carbon dioxide emissions from the City Council’s operations have gone up by 1.8%  in the past year, and that the actual amount saved over the last three years is 5.2%, not the 14% initially claimed.

Executive Member Nigel Murphy responded to a question by Cllr James Hennigan by telling  the assembled councillors and members of the public that he was willing to agree with Manchester Friends of the Earth’s analysis as long as it was noted that the Council has been sourcing its energy from “decarbonised sources.”

The Friends of the Earth submission, sent the previous night to the chair of the Committee included the immortal lines

“Achieving the operational and cultural changes to radically reduce greenhouse gas emissions is clearly not a simple task and will require dedicated and continuous action. it will also require a commitment to transparent and meaningful progress reporting.”

It continued

We therefore call on the Neighbourhoods Scrutiny Committee to request that the Annual Carbon Reduction Plan be amended to clearly state that there was a 1.8% increase in like-for-like emissions between 2011/2 and 2012/13, and that there has only been a 5.2% reduction in like-for-like emissions against the 2009/10 baseline.

In the past week Manchester Climate Monthly has pointed out, repeatedly, that if traffic signalling had not been taken off the City Council’s hands, then the claim of a 7% reduction in the last year would collapse.  The Council itself admitted that there was no overall reduction in emissions.

This makes the publicly-stated desire by several members of the Neighbourhoods Scrutiny Committee to have quarterly progress reports on the 2013/4 carbon “reduction” plan all the more important. watch this space.

Posted in Climate Change Action Plan, Manchester City Council | 1 Comment

#Manchester City Council to set up “Environmental Sustainability Subgroup” of councillors

A group of six councillors is aiming to look at how Manchester City Council can work better on “sustainability issues.”  Once its terms of reference are agreed (at an Economy Scrutiny Committee meeting today), the “Environmental Sustainability Subgroup” will hold three public meetings – in August, October and November – before convening to agree its final report.

The group is forming in response to unfinished business from several well-attended and positive meetings of the Economy Scrutiny Committee (ESC). This committee, one of the six scrutiny committees, mainly looks at employment, education and skills.  Given the lengthy list of reports the ESC already had on its “forward plan”, the proposal at the May 2013 meeting to establish a sub-group (made initially by Liberal Democrat Victor Chamberlain) was warmly welcomed.

The group will be made up of (at least) Councillors Kate Chappell, Suzanne Richards, Carl Ollerhead, Andrew Simcock, Angeliki Stoggia [all Labour] and Victor Chamberlain.  They plan to “liaise with relevant groups of councillors, council officers and external stakeholders working on sustainability issues to share knowledge and best practice and avoid duplication.

Subject to agreement today, the group’s objectives will be

1. To monitor the outcomes from the meetings held by the Economy Scrutiny Committee on the impact that Manchester’s economy has on the environment. To ensure that the recommendations made by the Committee are being progressed.
2. To investigate best practice and successes in the city, to determine what has worked and how to spread this knowledge and learning.
3. To investigate the Council’s approach to supporting the development of an environmentally sustainable economy.
4. To ensure that the recommendations from the Subgroup do not involve expenditure from the Council greater than the cost of time spent by staff in existing posts.

Its key lines of enquiry will be

– to review the recommendations and examine progress from the May 2013 meeting of the Economy Scrutiny Committee, which investigated Manchester’s economy in the context of minimising the impact on the environment.
– To liaise with relevant groups of councillors, council officers and external stakeholders working on sustainability issues to share knowledge and best practice and avoid duplication.
– To consider best practice and successes for the city to date, and the opportunities for spreading this knowledge.
– To examine how the impact on environmental sustainability can become an integral part of decision making in the Council.
– To work with officers to determine the feasibility of creating a real time dashboard measuring environmental impacts, similar to the one measuring economic impacts.
– To consider how Manchester can grow its base of sustainability focussed small and medium enterprises.
– To examine how the Council can help to bring about economic benefits and advantages to Manchester’s residents through environmental sustainability.

Meetings of the group “will be open to members of the media [I think they mean MCFly!] and public except where information which is confidential or exempt from publication is being considered.”

Basically, this is potentially the re-opening of constructive dialogue with the City Council that sputtered out with the unnecessary killing off of the Environmental Advisory Panel and the grotesque farce that is the Annual “Stakeholder” Conference.

Watch this space!

Marc Hudson
mcmonthly@gmail.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“Solving Business Problems with Environmental Data” #Manchester Sept 5th

Solving Business Problems with Environmental Data – pre-competition road-show

In the Autumn, the TSB and NERC will release a joint call for 6-12 month feasibility studies to create products, tools or services, that provide specific commercial benefits, increase resilience and address business risk by integrating environmental data with other sources. Although projects will be business led, it is expected that a project team will be a consortium of the business lead (which could be a software provider or the end user), end users, data providers and academics.

Prior to the launch, regional road-shows will provide information about the call, discuss available data and identify some of the end user challenges that could be addressed within the call. Road show events will be held in September in Manchester (5th), Bristol (10th) and Glasgow (18th). Further events to better understand the data and to facilitate the formation of consortia will be held in October (dates and venues to be decided).

For further information or to register at one of the workshops please see: https://connect.innovateuk.org/web/environmental-data-competition/overview

Andrea Sharpe aned@nerc.ac.uk

Posted in Business, Upcoming Events | Leave a comment

Not what we are LED to believe… #Manchester Art Gallery and carbon slippage #beyondthecarbonbudget

Munch_The_Scream_lithography1The devil really is in the detail.  Comparing the City Council’s Annual Carbon Reduction Plans of 2012/3 and 2013/4 is a thankless task. It’s also a job the Council’s officers – for some reason I can’t possibly fathom – have made more difficult than it needs to be.  The humour that you get from it is very bleak too, since it is a record of slippage and failure and more slippage on our species’ path to oblivion. Take this from the 2012/3 plan, about Manchester Art Gallery (1) –

5.10.11 Work is now also starting to be conducted at Directorate level, and Directorate’s support is needed to continue to reduce emissions; each Directorate is now reporting regularly to the Environmental Strategy Programme Board (ESPB) on progress within their estate and actions contained in their low carbon services plans. An example of a critical action delivered by a Directorate can be seen through the LED installation programme at Manchester Art Gallery.(Emphasis added)

The (2012/3) plan was;

5.2.4.7 Galleries/museums (6% of building emissions)
Manchester Art Gallery will complete its roll-out of LED lighting in the remaining 18 of its 20 galleries by October 2012, which will save 116 tonnes CO2 and £23,000 this year.

And what ends up being achieved, by July 2013?  Well, you have to search hard, but then you find this in the 2013/4 plan;

4.23 “Galleries and Museums (5% of building emissions)
Manchester Art Gallery will continue their energy management trials and research to reduce consumption in the building, and will install a new revolving door to allow better control of conditions. LEDs will be installed in the final six galleries.”

So, there were 18 galleries still without LEDs when the last plan was written. All were going to be completed by October 2012.  Except, by July 2013, a third were still without LEDs!  If the Council can’t even get small things like that right, what about the biggies, like grappling with the horror that is its Airport and prosperity model built on ever more consumption and travel?

Footnote
(1) The last time I was in Manchester Art Gallery was September 2008.  I had phoned up the Environmental Strategy Team (or “Green City Team” as it was then known) saying Manchester Climate Fortnightly was about to run a story called “The Missing Million” – about how the Council didn’t seem to be spending the Carbon Reduction Fund money.  Sharp intake of breath down the other end of a phone and a plea to meet asap.  I met with two officers.  I was told all sorts of wonderful stories about how they were about to announce a whole host of “future-proof” investments yadder yadder yadder.

I wanted to run a “let’s believe it when we see it” story, but my co-editors at the time said “let’s give them the benefit of the doubt.”  Sadly, I was right – the meeting had been a classic – as I now know it to be – delay and diversion tactic. Or “lie,” to give it its common-and-garden name.   One of the two officers is definitely still around.  Oddly less keen to meet these days, now that I know what I am doing and can’t be so easily fobbed off…

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment