Upcoming Event: “Climate of Fear” 5/6 May, Contact Theatre, #Manchester

New production at Contact Theatre – looks fab.  You book here.

Devised by the company in collaboration with poet, writer and director Zena Edwards, Climate of Fear looks at the emotion of anger through themes of climate justice, social inequality, memory and the body.

CYC Climate of Fear (4) photo by Lee BaxterOne by one, the company deliver a series of original monologues exploring their own questions about food, inequality, commodification and the environment.

The show opens Flying Solo, their annual festival celebrating what happens when performers go it alone, which runs from Thursday 5 – Saturday 14 May.

 

Disclosure: MCFly offered to publicise this show, and then was offered two comp tickets, and accepted them.  Going on the website of the director Zena Edwards, it looks like it’s going to be a damn fine evening.

Posted in Upcoming Events | Leave a comment

Repost: “Final Barton Moss trial ends with not guilty verdicts”

Via the excellent “Salford Star

FINAL BARTON MOSS TRIAL ENDS WITH NOT GUILTY VERDICTS

Star date: 27th April 2016

CALLS FOR PUBLIC INQUIRY AS FINAL THREE BARTON MOSS CHARGES QUASHED

After hundreds of charges brought by the Crown in relation to the Barton Moss anti-fracking protests of 2013 and 2014, the final three cases were heard today at Manchester Magistrates Court where the judge delivered `not guilty’ verdicts on charges of aggravated trespass.

Now, with the overwhelming number of charges either dropped or quashed, there’s a growing call for a Public Inquiry into the policing and cost of the response to the Salford protests…

Full details here…


Barton Moss Not Guilty Verdicts Barton Moss Not Guilty Verdicts
click image to enlarge
“The results today must add to the increasing demand for a Public Inquiry into the method of policing and cost to the public purse…” Simon Pook, solicitorToday at Manchester Magistrates Court, `not guilty’ verdicts were announced for three protectors charged with aggravated trespass at the Barton Moss anti-fracking protests which raged during the latter part of 2013 and early 2014.

Annabel Newfield, Stephen Jefferies and Laura Parkes participated in the slow walk demonstration on 18th February 2014 at the IGas exploratory drilling site in Salford, when they were pulled from the crowd and arrested during one of the nastiest police operations throughout the whole protest (see Salford Star report from the day – Salford Residents Shock at GMP Policing – click here).

The judge was shown footage, taken by both the police and an anti-fracking livestreamer, heard evidence from police officers present at the time and concluded that the prosecution case `contradicted the evidence’ before him.

In common with previous Barton Moss cases and, given the right to peaceful slow walk protests in front of delivery lorries, the charges centred on whether the accused were engaged in `unreasonable behaviour’, resisting efforts by the police to `encourage’them to walk by leaning back into officers; or whether the police were actually pushing them down the lane that led to the IGas site.

In giving evidence, the TAU’s [Tactical Aid Unit] officer Bevan and other officers conceded that the TAU were brought in at certain points in the protest to increase the pace of the slow walks… “That’s the only reason we would be deployed” said Bevan“To speed things up.”

The officers also conceded that the three were not swearing or being abusive in any way, although PC Bolt insisted that Annabel Newfield was resisting walking… “It was a constant lean with her full body weight”…

Annabel’s solicitor sardonically replied “She’s not a sizeable lady is she? She shouted at you to stop pushing her.”

Meanwhile, the court heard that former serviceman and current firefighter, Stephen Jefferies, had gone to the protest wearing an army beret and medals in an effort to“break down the stereotype of protesters” and had tried to engage the police in dialogue throughout the slow walk, until he was arrested…

“All the prosecution has shown is that he didn’t walk quickly enough and that doesn’t amount to unreasonable behaviour” argued his barrister, Richard Brigden.

Passing `not guilty’ verdicts, the judge said that at no point did he see any of the defendants leaning backwards and that there was “no consistency” in the pace of the walk that the police imposed. He concluded that all three defendants were of good character and that “I broadly accept their evidence”.

The `not guilty’ verdicts bring to a close the Barton Moss trials, which have seen the vast majority of charges either dropped or quashed. Indeed, a report into the policing at Barton Moss by John Moores University and York Universitytitled Keep Moving! – concluded that the Greater Manchester Police operation “was driven by interests other than public order and crime prevention”.

It added that the operation “served to physically clear protesters from the site, to deter others from attending the camp and to reinforce the construction of protesters as violent criminals and thereby legitimise the intensity of the policing operation”.

According to the report’s statistics of court cases related to Barton Moss, up until February this year there was a conviction rate of only 26%, while the conviction rate for public order offences nationally is as high as 96%. It all leaves a lot of questions unanswered…

Richard Brigden, of leading human rights chambers Garden Court North, has, together with Simon Pook of Lizar Solicitors, defended the right to lawful peaceful protest and held the state to account for its actions.

“I welcome the result today, it further highlights the overwhelming theme of innocence”Simon Pook told the Salford Star after today’s verdicts “The results today must add to the increasing demand for  a Public Inquiry into the method of policing and cost to the public purse.”

The sentiment was underlined by Stephen Jefferies outside court this afternoon…

“It’s been a long two years, like a dark cloud hanging over me because I have had to answer to a judge but I also have to answer to my employer as firefighter as well, so the fear of losing my job has been constantly there in the background and given me sleepless nights” he explained.

“I’m pleased but it’s tinged with a bit of annoyance that it’s actually taken this long, especially with the money it’s cost” he said “It seems to me that there wasn’t much of a case against us, as was shown today. But they still relentlessly pursued it at public expense.

“I think when David Cameron says that no expense will be spared in the pursuit of fracking, this is what he means, that he will pursue every single protester and take them through court to try and scare them off from doing it again” he added “Justice was done today, although there are some people who were found guilty and will feel that they’ve had an injustice, as they are equally as innocent as us.”

Annabel Newfield felt the same emotions… “It’s been two years and three months since we were arrested at Barton Moss and it just seems so ridiculous that we even got arrested in the first place” she said “It just felt really stupid that they took my freedom. I’m incredibly happy with this verdict, which is a just verdict, because we didn’t do anything wrong. We just exercised our peaceful right to protest.”

Posted in Campaign Update | 2 Comments

Upcoming Event: “Education and Climate Change” Fri 13 May, #Manchester

Two weeks until a national conference, held in Manchester on “The role of education institutions in tackling climate change”

For further details and to register for this free event, click here.

[And maybe sometime soon the well-funded-with-council-money ‘Manchester A Certain Future’ group could get around to put it on their calendar?]

BLURB –

This event has been called by UCU, supported by the National Union of Students, to look at the role the education sector has to play in the delivery of a low carbon economy.

On Friday 21 April  2016 the Paris climate agreement was signed in New York. It will become legally enforceable in the UK. Education, research and finance form part of this agreement. The education sector has a massive role to play in the delivery of a low carbon economy. This conference will explore the implications for the tertiary education sector. Industrial strategy in the UK will fail to deliver the Paris objectives unless it incorporates the 3 cross-cutting themes of skills and knowledge, research, and finance. The conference focuses on these themes and the actions needed by policy makers and institutions.

A number of key questions must be answered if the sector is going to make a decisive contribution to the transition to a new economy.

  • What do we mean by carbon literacy and are institutions doing enough for their staff, students and their local communities?
  • How is the sector performing on climate research and how should it shape government and industrial policy??
  • What role for institutions engaging with fossil fuel companies to shift their trajectory to a more sustainable footing?
  •  What are the policy priorities to ensure that the sector is aligned with the vision of a zero carbon economy?

Who should attend – UCU and NUS members.  Other college and university staff interested in climate change policy are welcome to attend. Individuals and organisations with links to the education sector are also invited.

Venue: University of Manchester.  J17 Renold Building, which is a 5 minute stroll from the Manchester Piccadilly railway station (building number 8 on the campus mapOpens new window).

Date: Friday 13 May 2016

Time: 11.00am – 3.30pm

Cost: this is a free event. Lunch will be provided. UCU members will be able to claim travel expenses

Draft programme:

11am – Registration and refreshments

11.15 – Joint chair opening comments – Michael MacNeil, National Head of Bargaining and Negotiations, UCU and Piers Telemacque, vice president NUS

11.30 – Climate change and the Curriculum : chair – NUS

  • HE sector – Professor Julia King, the Baroness Brown of Cambridge, Vice Chancellor, Aston University
  • FE and Adult sector – Dr Ken Thompson, Principal of Forth Valley College

12.30 – Climate Change and Research : chair – UCU

  • Dr Carly McLachlan, Tyndall Research Centre
  • Professor Kate Rigby, Chair of Environmental Humanities, Research & Graduate Affairs, Bath Spa University

1.15pm – Lunch

1.45 – Climate change and Finance: chair – NUS

  • Finance sector speaker (tbc)
  • Evette Prout, Sheffield student union’s development officer
  • Andy Kerr, member of the University of Edinburgh Fossil Fuel Working Group and Executive Director of the Edinburgh Centre for Carbon Innovation

2.45 – Final plenary ‘The Green Economy and the role of education’: chair – UCU

  • Lisa Nandy, MP, Shadow Energy Minister

3.20 – UCU and NUS chairs’ closing comments

3.30 – Networking opportunities

There will be ample time provided for discussion following the presentations.

Further information and enquiries: contact Graham Petersen

Posted in academia, Upcoming Events | Leave a comment

#Manchester Labour lifts its game on survey response.

manchesterlabourresponsesTen Labour Party candidates for Manchester City Council seats have now responded to Friends of the Earth’s survey about their environmental beliefs and policy commitments.  They are second only to the Greens, with 14 responses, and ahead of the Liberal Democrats on 6.  One notable absentee from the list of councillors who have responded is Council leader Richard Leese, engaged in a fierce battle to retain his wafer-thin majority in Crumpsall.

This improvement in responses follows (but correlation is not necessarily causation) a story last week by MCFly which pointed out that only 2 of the 32 candidates had replied.

The Council elections are on Thursday 5th May.  It doesn’t matter that much who wins what seat, because the only things that will make the Council keep to its environmental promises are

a) a miracle

and/or

b) a growing, learning, organising and winning coalition of clued-up social movement organisations, capable of nurturing talent, spreading skills, avoiding burnout and capable of offering ongoing opportunities for ‘legitimate peripheral participation’ (i.e. you can be involved without going to soul-sucking meetings or on idiotic marches in London/Albert Square).

Neither a) nor b) is going to happen, now is it?

Posted in Manchester City Council | Leave a comment

#Manchester Steering Group finally takes action! Redefines “not ignoring you”.

The Manchester A Certain Future “Steering Group”, (the one that gets loads of council money, holds meetings in secret, breaks promises to produce newsletters, and held a meeting with 2 present and 8 apologies) has finally taken some concrete action!

Is it to hold the elections that were supposed to happen in 2010? No, don’t be silly.
Is it to bring back the stakeholder conference that was unilaterally cancelled in 2013? No, be sensible.
It’s to… redefine the English language, so that failing to reply to four emails in two weeks, all requesting basic information about the Group, does not constitute ‘ignoring’ the sender.

On April 12th, after publishing an article about the Group’s rescinded (that’s a posh word for broken) promise to produce newsletters, Manchester Climate Monthly sent an email asking about another statement in the 2015 Annual report

“fast-paced format has been well-received by those attending to date and provides a blueprint for future events over the coming year, including events to the target audiences identified

According to the website, there haven’t been any events.

So, is the website wrong? If not, why no events?

An email in reply stated that “There have been a number of events, and there are more in train.”

MCFly replied on the same day (12th April)

your answer implies that there have been a number of events that MACF have run AND that there are others that you’ve been ‘partnering’ on.

So, I propose that some of the £20k that the council gives you for secretariat function goes towards

a) updating the website to reflect these wonderful facts  (it’s odd that I am having to type that, in mid-April 2016, 10 months after the last AGM)

and

b) sending me a list of dates when and where these events took place (especially the MACF-solo ones, but also the partnered ones) and numbers and types of people who attended (since the annual report talks about “target audiences identified”.

Back to my day job too now.

There was no reply on the day, or since then.

On the 14th we asked about

Hello Gavin,

while Stephanie or A.N. Other is compiling the list of MACF events to send to me (and presumably to add to the website), I have another question.

On page 10 of the 2015 annual report there are paragraphs about the MACF plan.

“The process for its publication will be published by early 2016, including opportunities for stakeholders to get involved.”

I have not seen this at all.

There seem to be three possibilities

a) it is on schedule and I just haven’t seen it – link please

b) it is behind schedule – statement for publication please as to why it is behind schedule and when it will finally be released.

c) it is, as with the newsletter, not happening – statement for publication please

There was no reply.

On April 19th that email was sent again, with a cover note-

Hello Gavin,

in case this one slipped through your net.
Thanks

There was no reply.

On the 25th April,

Dear Gavin,

as you can see, I emailed you on the 14th of April and again on the 19th of April, with no response.

My questions remain the exactly the same, with two additional ones.

a) Where on the website can I find the CIC’s articles of association?  If they are not on the website, why not?  Please supply me with a copy if they are not.

b)  According to the 18th February meeting (the one where 8 apologies were sent), there have now been two further meetings

17th March – Steering Group

21st April – Directors

When will the minutes of the 17th March, which were presumably ‘approved’ at the 21st April  meeting, be available?

If the minutes will not be available until the next Steering Group meeting on 19th May, then I have one very simple question – who attended the meeting on the 17th, who sent their apologies, and who was AWOL?

Looking forward to all of these replies.

There was no reply.

Finally, yesterday (26th April), having checked relevant twitter feeds, we sent this.

Dear Gavin,

it occurred to me that me perhaps I was receiving no reply from you because that you were incapacitated with illness or family business.

However, I’ve checked out your twitter feed and it is regularly updated and nothing is amiss.

Could you please supply email addresses for

a) Stephanie Lynch in her official MACF capacity

b) at least one other member of the CIC Executive Board

Why? Well given the lack of replies from you of late, in future I will be ccing my questions about the performance of MACF- which has received over 75 thousand pounds of council money (and that’s not including seconded staff) – to them as well.

Very best wishes

On this occasion though, MCFly also cced in two Manchester City Councillors.

And – “as if by magic” – a reply. This.

Hey Marc

We will be replying to your e-mails – however it’s not presently / hasn’t been at the top of the collective ‘to do list’.

But rest assured I’ve not forgotten that you’ve contacted me / us nor am I ignoring you.. (emphasis added)

We will be replying to your various requests shortly.

Gavin

Well, that’s alright then.

Posted in Democratic deficit | 2 Comments

Not #Manchester; Reality Check on Paris – “This Changes Nothing”

Clive Spash got monstered a few years back in Australia, for simply telling the truth. Some (Labor) politicians did not like this.  Well, he’s clearly not learnt his lesson, because he’s telling the truth again.

For a Manchester take on this, see the interview with Professor Kevin Anderson on the subject of the outcomes of Paris, conducted in January.

Imho, we’re toast. #carpethediems.

This Changes Nothing: The Paris Agreement to Ignore Reality
CLIVE L. SPASH

Globalizations, 2016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2016.1161119

WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna, Austria

spash 1ABSTRACT At the 21st session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change held in Paris, France, 30 November to 11 December 2015, an Agreement was reached by the international community including 195 countries. The Agreement has been hailed, by participants and the media, as a major turning point for policy in the struggle to address human-induced climate change. The following is a short critical commentary in which I briefly explain why the Paris Agreement changes nothing. I highlight how the Agreement has been reached by removing almost all substantive issues concerning the causes of human-induced climate change and offers no firm plans of action. Instead of substantive cuts in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, as soon as possible, the intentions of the parties promise escalation of damages and treat worst-case scenarios as an acceptable 50:50 chance. The Paris Agreement signifies commitment to sustained industrial growth, risk management over disaster prevention, and future inventions and technology as saviour. The primary commitment of the international community is to maintain the current social and economic system. The result is denial that tackling GHG emissions is incompatible with sustained economic growth. The reality is that Nation States and international corporations are engaged in an unremitting and ongoing expansion of fossil fuel energy exploration, extraction and combustion, and the construction of related infrastructure for production and consumption. The targets and promises of the Paris Agreement bear no relationship to biophysical or social and economic reality.

Keywords: climate change, public policy, UNFCCC, COP

Posted in Signs of the Pending Ecological Debacle, Uncategorized | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Campaign Update: Carbon Coop #Manchester

Missed Carbon Coop‘s weekend of seeing green houses (retrofits and all that)? Well, they made a video…

Posted in Campaign Update, youtubes | Leave a comment

Only 2 of Labour’s 32 #Manchester candidates answer ‘green’ survey

[Manchester Climate Monthly does not endorse any political party. Its editor never has been a member of any political party.]

Only two of the Labour Party’s 32 candidates for the upcoming local elections have bothered to answer questions put to them by Friends of the Earth.

The traditional pre-election survey, which takes a lot of work  to organise(done by volunteers) goes out to almost all candidates for local authority seats across Greater Manchester.

friends of earth election surveyFor Manchester, where 32 council seats are up for grabs, the current response rates are as follows
Conservatives: 1
Liberal Democrats: 6
Greens: 6
Labour: 2

 

 

So nice to see how much the Labour party, which currently has all 96 council seats, cares about environmental issues. It’s almost as if they are complacent about total victory in May.

Posted in Democratic deficit, Uncategorized | Tagged | 6 Comments

Looting the Ivory Tower: On the UK Climate Change Act 2008…

Lorenzoni, I. and Benson, D. 2014. Radical institutional change in environmental governance: Explaining the origins of the UK Climate Change Act 2008 through discursive and streams perspectives.  Global Environmental Change, Vol. 29 pp.210-21.

lootingivorytowerThe TL;DR. You can look at the political and social forces that led to the UK Climate Act 2008 in various valid ways.  Implementation of policy is another matter, however

Their argument in a tweet: (140 characters). UK made tough legal climate targets in 2008, thanks to social movements, idea-mongers and politicians.

Should activists pay attention? (If yes, why)
Yes.  This was our “big success”, and it’s important to know where it came from.  Social movement organisations (Friends of the Earth, WWF) did some good public and private lobbying, and there was even political competition between Labour, Lib Dems and Conservatives, that led to tougher than expected targets.

Of course, laws and targets are one thing, implementation is another…

What’s the issue?
The passage of a law that mandates 80% cuts of all greenhouse gases by 2050.

What do they have to say?
Two different models of analysing political change – John Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Model, and Discursive Institutionalism (Vivien Schmidt et al) are both handy in thinking through who did what when and to what effect.  Both spotlight different factors and actors that helped push events along. The paper does NOT deal with the sorry aftermath since 2010.  Hopefully they will do this in another paper?

How convincing is their methodology?
Good.  They read a lot, then did interviews with people in the know, then triangulated

What else would a critic say?
“Why not use Advocacy Coalition Frameworks, or Punctuated Equilibrium?”  [or at least justify why not using them.  There are some minor factual errors/typos etc.  But on the whole?  ‘Good job!!’

What else could they have said?
The implementation question!!

What are the implications for (Manchester-based) activism?
Makes you realise that there was a set of special pressures in 2007-2009, and that the soufflé won’t be re-heated.  We’re toast (to mix metaphors)
What papers/books to do these people refer to that looks (or is) interesting?

Benson, D., Lorenzoni, I., 2014. Examining the scope for national lesson-drawing on climate governance. Polit. Q. 85 (2), 202–211, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467- 923X.12080.

Brunner, S., 2008. Understanding policy change: multiple streams and emissions trading in Germany. GEC 18, 501–507.

Davies, P.H.J., 2001. Spies as informants: triangulation and the interpretation of Elite interview data in the study of the intelligence and security services. Politics 21 (1), 73–80.

Farley, J., Baker, D., Batker, D., Koliba, C., Matteson, R., Mills, R., Pittman, J., 2007. Opening the SM for ecological economics: Katrina as a focusing event. Ecol. Econ. 63, 344–354.

Nerlich, B., 2012. ‘Low carbon’ metals, markets and metaphors: the creation of economic expectations about climate change mitigation. Clim. Change 110, 31–51. Pidgeon, N.F., 2012. Public understanding of, and attitudes to, climate change: UK and international perspectives and policy. Clim. Policy 12, S85–S106.

Rayner, T., Jordan, A., 2010. The United Kingdom: a paradoxical leader. In: Wurzel, R.K.W., Connelly, J. (Eds.), The European Union as a Leader in International Climate Change Politics. Routledge, London, pp. 95–111.

Schmidt, V.A., 2010. Taking ideas and discourse seriously: explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’. Eur. Polit. Sci. Rev. 2 (1), 1–25.

Posted in academia, Looting TIvory Tower | Leave a comment

Environment Forum Weds 27 April #Manchester

via email
Dear friends and colleagues,

A lot is going on in the field of environmental campaigning at the moment, and some of us thought it would be worth exploring the idea of an Environment Forum to bring together those with a positive pro-environment campaigning orientation in Greater Manchester.

The idea is to share information (on what we are doing and on what is going on around us) to enable co-operation and avoid clashes, making us collectively more effective. This is going to be particularly important as devolution takes off with both the risks (a business as usual model emphasising things like aviation and road building) and the opportunities (regional decision-making on formerly nationally decided areas of policy and expenditure) that this brings.

We have two drop-in sessions scheduled for people to come along and discuss. Firstly, next Wednesday, 27 April, 6.30pm – 9pm at Green Fish Resource Centre, 46-50 Oldham St. – please let us know if you’re planning to join us.

And we’ll also be running a session at the Greater Manchester NEON social event at Bridge 5 Mill, on Saturday, 30 April, so if you are going to that, then do pop by.

We’ll pull together the results of these meetings as a basis for setting up the forum.

To help with that we’ve also designed a quick online survey so you can give us your thoughts. You can access it here – it won’t take long so please do consider doing it now:

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1pEpY3G2R0V3oU8n87JzR3pGLufNUbc1mNdxJdZxnG_k/viewform

We look forward to seeing and/or hearing from you.

Ali Abbas (Manchester FOE), Laura Williams (Global Justice Now), Mark Burton (Steady State Manchester).

Posted in Campaign Update | Leave a comment