#Manchester Council proclaims itself transparent. Want to know how “Clean City” money is spent? You gotta use FoIA.

Update: The Council has got even more Airport Windfall money this year.

Manchester City Council bleats loud and long about openness and transparency. In early June bureaucrats assured elected members they would explain the “Clean and Green Fund” better. A month later, if you want to know who is getting what, you still have to use the Freedom of Information Act. Manchester – you have to weep for it.

The back-story in bullet points;
In July 2013 the Council learnt it would get a £14.5m windfall from the rather-profitable-at-present (don’t mention the carbon) Manchester Airports Group, of which it is 35% owner.
In September it announced it wanted to set up a “Clean and Green fund” to disperse that money. MCFly asked the relevant Executive Member what was particularly green about it, since there was no mention of carbon emissions or biodiversity He was uncharacteristically non-specific.
A few people (MCFly editor included) set up a campaigning group called “Ask the people of Manchester” to try to convince the Council to hold a public consultation on how to spend the money. We listed 5 reasons why a consultation was a good idea, and 4 reasons why should the current non-consultation way of dispersing the money was bad.
We failed to get the 4000 signatures you need to force a debate in Council. Ho-hum.

The petition got discussed, eventually, by the “Finance Scrutiny Committee” in June 2014. From the minutes, it seems that there was much time spent dismissing of the Ask the People of Manchester campaign. What a surprise.
The recommendations included this –

Now, if you want to know how the £14.5m is being allocated, you can ask the Executive Member for the Environment. She will probably tell you to look at this website. http://www.manchester.gov.uk/cleancity
That’s what she told MCFly in mid-May.
We did. There were no details. So we decided to use the Freedom of Information Act to try to prise information from the cold dead fingers of the Council.

Now, in mid July, a month after a bureaucrat was instructed, by elected members, to “promote to residents which groups have so far received funding and what it will be used for” the website STILL has no details. And the elected members haven’t checked up to see if it was done.

Oh, by the way, here are the results of the FoIA.


MCFly says: Bureaucrats are bureaucrats. They like the dark, they like not being held accountable (and they never have to face the electorate) That’s true from Manchester to Mumbai, from Adelaide to Zanzibar. If you’re going to be a community activist, you had better get used to it (while still trying to change it, find ways round it).

What is extraordinary is how Manchester’s elected members allow themselves to be fobbed off, repeatedly. If you ever attend a scrutiny committee meeting (and I recommend it as an anthropological exercise; just don’t go alone or you might end up converting to fascism), you’ll see elected members ask specific questions. The bureaucrats (with honorable exceptions – well done Julie Price) will duck, weave, waffle or answer a different question. The member will sigh/roll their eyes/mutter about questions not being answered. Then they seem to think they’ve discharged their democratic duty. They haven’t.
Perhaps Councillor Chappell would like to write a post on her blog about this subject?

See also: blistering piece by Janan Ganesh in Financial Time of Sat 12th July2014 “Sir Humphrey is a servant who needs a lesson in civility”.

About manchesterclimatemonthly

Was print format from 2012 to 13. Now web only. All things climate and resilience in (Greater) Manchester.
This entry was posted in Aviation, Democratic deficit, Manchester Airport, Manchester City Council. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to #Manchester Council proclaims itself transparent. Want to know how “Clean City” money is spent? You gotta use FoIA.

  1. Sam Darby says:

    If I was a cynical person, remembering that in the Councils Revenue Budget Report last year the City Treasurer anticipated that there would be more airport dividends to come but could not say exactly how much, I would think that the Council intended to close libraries, swimming pools, daycentres for disabled people because it wants to, so it went ahead, while knowing that they would have some sweetmeat dividend to provide little treats to calm savage breasts and appear to be ‘clean and green’.
    This is how Labour will continue to fulfil one of its three core economic objectives to “reduce dependancy on public services”.
    Sam Darby

    • It’s a good thing neither you nor I is a cynical person, Sam! Any news from any of the three Burnage councillors as to whether they have completed their carbon literacy training, or intend to? Please ask your friends in other wards to ask their councillors!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s