If you haven’t signed the petition already, it’s here.
Anyone who lives or works or studies in Manchester can sign…
If you haven’t signed the petition already, it’s here.
Anyone who lives or works or studies in Manchester can sign…
The silence from Manchester City Council gets ever more deafening, as it persists in NOT endorsing the city council’s latest Climate Action Plan. In July the 2013-4 “Annual Carbon Reduction Plan” of the Council went to a scrutiny committee. After questioning, it was conceded that the press released “reduction” of 7% was in fact a 1.8% increase in the council’s own emissions (the reduction claimed was simply an accounting exercise).
Previous Annual Carbon Reduction Plans were sent straight on to Executive to be endorsed. This plan did not go to the July Executive. It did not go to the September Executive. And it will not go to the October Executive (see our speculation that it might here).
Manchester Climate Monthly has been asking, repeatedly, for a reason. We have received nothing substantive so far, other than – after a few weeks – a promise to get back to us.
Where is the democracy? Where is the urgency? Where is the credibility? For all of these, the term “Missing inaction” seems most appropriate.
Will councillors who sit on the Neighbourhoods Scrutiny Committee raise it as an issue? How about councillors on the Environmental Sustainability Subgroup? Don’t go holding your breath.
If you want to find out more, perhaps you can contact your local councillors (find them here). As well, you might even drop the Executive Member for the Environment a line – cllr.n.murphy@manchester.gov.uk
Here below, for the record, is what they will be talking about, next Weds, 23rd October, 10am at Manchester Town Hall.
Executive meeting Wednesday, 23 October 2013
Download the Agenda (Download Agenda. 28.33 KB)
Item 4 – Manchester International Festival (Download Report. 107.09 KB)
Item 5 – Network Rail (Ordsall Chord) Order Application to the Secretary of State for a Transport (Download Report. 88.3 KB)
Item 6 – Revisions to Manchester’s Local Funding Formula for Schools for Implementation in 2014 -15 (Download Report. 49.03 KB)
Item 7 – National Non-Domestic Rates Policy document – areas of local discretion (Download Report. 79.38 KB)
Item 9 – Global Revenue Monitoring (Download Report. 74.26 KB)
Item 10 – Capital Programme – Proposed Increases (Download Report. 31.5 KB)
Item 11 – Capital Programme Monitoring 2013/14 (Download Report. 126.38 KB)
Item 12 – New Smithfield Market: Development Strategy (Download Report. 305.86 KB)
Item 17 – Greater Manchester Combined Authority 27 September (Download Report. 31.06 KB)
Item 18 – AGMA Executive Board 27 September (Download Report. 14.03 KB)
More about Manchester Metropolitan University’s Humanities in Public programme.
Of special interest to MCFly readers will be;
Weds 20th November 2013 “Global Citizens and Global Futures”
Weds 5th March 2014 “Feminism in the 21st Century: Privilege, Bias and Feminist Practice”
Monday 12th May 2014 “Reach for the stars: On haptic perception and the atmosphere”
Monday 19th May “Sensing Place” symposium is probably also a good’un
Why does this video exist?
Because more people should know about MMU’s “Humanities in Public” programme. It is one of the things that universities should have been doing forever. And when it does start to happen, it deserves a shout out.
Why is it so crap?
You mean the camera “work” and everything? Because I am not a professional. It’s one of my hobbies. I’ll get better, perhaps. The interviewee (Prof Berthold Schoene) is very good though, isn’t he?
Why have you not edited out the last three minutes?
Because the question “how will you measure success” is a crucial one in any endeavour (though often, unavoidably, only fuzzy answers can be given. Fuzzy can be okay). Also, Prof Schoene does something that is, in my experience, very unusual. Unbidden, he gives credit to someone else, and to someone who is, gasp, female. Now, that’s just good manners and common sense and fair, but you’d be surprised how rare that is. So, he deserved that to be seen and – more importantly – Helen Malarky deserved the shout out to be heard.
Is this news? No, this is information. News is something that someone, somewhere, doesn’t want you to know. But information is fine too!
If any other candidates for Young Greens co-chair role (whether they are based in the North West or elsewhere) want to answer these questions too, we shall post the answers. Can’t say fairer than that…
Who are you/What are you doing at University of Manchester, around campaigning and getting students to vote in elections.
My name is Clifford Fleming and I’m currently the Campaigns and Citizenship Officer at the University of Manchester Students’ Union. My primary purpose is to get more students campaigning, and to direct the Union’s work on citizenship and wider societal issues. Every day in my role I realise more and more how important activism and politics are. Without challenging the status quo, society would never change. In my role I want to help students get involved in campaigning on issues they care about and get students to engage in politics at all levels.
Who are your heroes?
I don’t really have any individual heroes or heroines. I’m very critical as a person, and that probably leads me into being critical of putting too much emphasis on the individual. It is often collective action that changes society the most, such as movements in history like the Suffragette movement. I have respect for many, many individuals but I wouldn’t say I have any heroes or heroines. Maybe I just need to read into history a little more and then I’ll change my mind? But then again I quite like being as critical as I am. Difficult question!
What do you wish you could tell the you of three years ago?
Three years ago I would be a few weeks into starting University, and I would probably tell myself not to worry so much about everything! I don’t know if I’d want to change any of my own history because what has happened has made me the person of today. Although I’d probably tell myself to spend less time drinking and more time reading.
What skills/knowledge do you want to develop in yourself in the coming years?
It’s difficult to know what exactly I’ll need to equip myself with over the coming years ahead. I’m 21 years old and I have a wealth of knowledge I still need to obtain. Probably the top of my list is to gain a little more confident in myself and my beliefs. It’s easy to get lost in debates and take on criticism too much. Conviction doesn’t come easily but maybe that’s a good thing? Should anyone be totally confident in themselves and their ideas, and if so how can anyone be challenged? Maybe more importantly I’d like to develop my communication skills. It seems everything nowadays is about how you can communicate it.
What skills/knowledge do you think are most lacking in the green movement?
I think often the green movement lacks expertise in promotion and strategy. It’s difficult because obviously in an idealistic World all citizens would care about the planet we live on, no matter what. In reality messages about climate change are fighting against messages from retailers, fast-food restaurants, consumer-goods companies and just about every other company in existence! Messages are competing in a strange, surreal perception market where an individual picks and chooses the messages they want to pay attention to (maybe not consciously however). When companies have lots of money they can make their cause alluring, sexy and exciting. The problem being is that you can’t really make climate science as enticing as a cocktail bar, and should we have to? Without big changes soon, our World is under serious threat. But how do we communicate the seriousness of green issues when people are exposed to so many different messages and asked to do or buy so many things? Often people just choose to ignore messages coming in. I think the green movement needs to think more strategically about communication.
You’re standing for Co-Chair of the Young Greens. What does the job entail, why do you think you’d be good at it and what do you think you’d struggle with?
Well the job description online reads:
“The two co-chairs work together to provide direction for the Young Greens and are the public face of the organisation (including sitting on the national Green Party Executive). They oversee the work of the committee, chair committee meetings, and help the other committee members when they need it. They also normally manage any big projects or things that cross several people’s responsibilities.”
So largely all of what is said there.
All in all I think that it will largely depend on the other co-chair and committee. It’s essential that if I’m elected we work together as a team. On a personal point I want to build up the communication that we put out to our members nationally and strengthen our media and social media. I’d like to see the Young Greens leading on campaign work, getting involved in grass-roots campaigning all over the country; whether that be in the green movement or the protection of public services or other causes at the heart of Green Party politics. I see the job as a good way to use my management and organisational skills to help develop these things. I also think it’s important to build up our regional groups, as at the moment it’s very hit-and-miss in how much you can get involved in the Young Greens. We need to be more of a national party, and that’s where my experience with establishing Young Greens North can help.
The only struggle I can see is making sure I manage my time well. I have managed it so far with Young Greens North, but at a national level this will probably become more difficult. As a full-time sabbatical officer at the University of Manchester Students’ Union, often I am quite busy with work and campaigning here with students. As an elected Campaigns Officer I’d like to think that my involvement in campaigns can only strengthen the Young Greens nationally, but I take onboard criticism that my life may become a lot more hectic and time-managed if I’m elected!
Anything else you’d like to say?
One thing I’d like to say is just a shout out to any students who are reading this and want to get involved in campaigning or get involved with the Young Greens. Don’t hesitate to send me an email on: Clifford.fleming@manchester.ac.uk
The more people campaigning together, the better collective action we can take.
[Interview conducted via email. Typos in the questions to Clifford have been corrected. His answers have not bee altered or cut. MCFly editor Marc Hudson is not a member of the Greens, or indeed any political party, but has – in response to a request – provided a written endorsement.]
UPDATE: We received this two minutes ago, from Chris Wright of AfSL.
“Sorry to spoil the opportunity for a sensational headline, but AfSL has no intention of ‘shutting its doors’. It is true that our Big Lottery grant comes to an end on 31st January 2014 but that isn’t our only source of income. We also have several irons in the fire in terms of further funding. Rest assured that the future of the secretariat role for the Stakeholder Steering Group is secure with AfSL.”
MCFly says; Not a sensational headline. Factual and undenied in the above statement. It’s also good to see that AfSL can, when it wants, take less than a month to supply a statement. And the fact remains that Chris Wright did openly speculate at last December’s AGM that AfSL might not exist in a year’s time.
UPDATE 16th October. This.
We only have one source (bad journalism).
It’s facebook (even worse journalism!)
[Update: The facebook screengrab that illustrated this story has been removed. The general point is this though – if you don’t want people to know what you are doing, maybe DON’T POST IT FOR THE WORLD TO SEE ON FACEBOOK? Just sayin’. ]
But it seems that – as hinted as a possibility at its 2012 AGM – (see MCFly report), Action for Sustainable Living might be shutting its doors. At the very least, it is in dire financial straits, with at least one of its core staff job hunting. In response to a question about whether funding had run out, this member of staff confirmed “yep, end of January [2014]”
There is nowt about closure on AfSl’s website, so it may be that the news isn’t terminal.
We will (try to) get more information tomorrow and pass it on.
It will be interesting to see what plans there are for the secretariat function of the “Stakeholder” “Steering” “Group.”
If you have any problems viewing this announcement, please visit
http://einstitute.worldbank.org/ei/course/cities-and-climate-change-leadership
Manchester City Council publishes a list of “big decisions they are making soon.” They update that list pretty frequently. Here’s a grab from the latest version;
Personally, I am betting very heavily AGAINST the appearance of the Green and Blue Infrastructure Strategy. Although it was promised as happening the following week by Council Leader Richard Leese at July full Council (while he was sneering at a Lib Dem for having the temerity to raise the question of Withington Green), the plan is one of those many waiting-for-godot style documents that’s been almost with us for, well, years. And when it does finally see the light of day, I think it’s safe to say that it will be somewhat underwhelming. And anyway, hopefully it will be going to the relevant (in this case Neighbourhoods) Scrutiny Committee first, where members of the public have a better shot at asking questions of it than at Executive.
The discussion of the second item, the Carbon “Reduction” Plan should be HIGHLY entertaining (if it does indeed ever get to Executive. It should have in July, but didn’t. It should have in September, but didn’t.)
This is a document that tried (and failed) to spin a 1.8% increase in emissions from council activities as a 7 percent decrease. This is a document that uses 2009/10 as a baseline instead of 2005, as per the Climate Change Action Plan. This is a debacle. If it weren’t tragic, it would be a comedy (a Feydeau farce that has us all keeling over in the aisles, p’haps?)
The Executive meets, in public, on Weds 23rd October at 10am in the Town Hall. The agenda for that meeting, which may or may not include the above items, will go up the council’s website on Weds 16th or so. Watch this space…
Marc Hudson
mcmonthly@gmail.com
The email below is from Ali Abbas, of Friends of the Earth. You can can reach him ali@manchesterfoe.org.uk
Hi all,
I just wanted to update you on our plans for the fracking day of action on Saturday 19 October.
For those that missed last Tuesday’s full group meeting, the aim of the day of action is to engage as many people as possible about fracking in and get a photo in the local paper to help put pressure on the local council to go frack free.
The theme will be “The Fracking Word is a Dirty Word”, and we’ll be asking passers-by to sign postcards to their council leader and put them in a “swear box”. If you’d like more details, join us at the climate campaign meeting from 6pm – 8pm on Wednesday at the Green Fish Resource Centre, or download the action guide, a summary briefing on fracking and the fracking FAQ.
After discussions with the anti-fracking group in Salford, we’ve decided to hold our stall from 10am to 4pm on Saturday 19 October in Eccles – either in Eccles Market if we can get a stall there, or at the bottom of Church Street opposite the bus station.
Thanks to everyone who’s already offered to help with the action. We don’t expect you to spend all day at the stall (unless you really want to!) – even half an hour would be enough to give someone else a break – so please email/text me with the times you’re available (along with your mobile number) so I can make sure we have enough cover throughout the day. And just to let you know, we can reimburse travel costs if you’d like us to.
It would also be really helpful if we could find volunteers for a few specific tasks:
If you’d like to help with any of these specific roles, or if you have any questions, please get in touch.
Cheers,
Ali
P.S. Here are links to the two films we showed at the meeting, and the one we didn’t:
P.P.S. Check out this blog about the Energy Bill, which explains it much better than I did!
Steering Group September 2014 Status Report
What a difference a year makes! From quips about “fills a much-needed gap” to “vital midwife in constrained times” in less than a year. Where did it all start to go right?
September 2013 – a full and frank discussion about what members were willing and able to bring to the table, what they expected personally and what they expected the organisation to achieve. Some people left, but over time membership of the steering group had become something that was both challenging and rewarding – personally, professionally, intellectually and morally. With a higher profile – both on the web and by routinely identifying themselves at all climate-related events, and giving a short spiel about the Steering Group, more and more citizens of Manchester became aware of the Group, what it could and couldn’t do, and how they could help and be helped by it.
The “triage” of the MACF document was – all agreed – much needed. And there was surprisingly little complaint from, well, anyone. With a new, more tightly focussed set of targets, with SMART goals, names and traffic lights attached, everyone felt a little more confident.
The turning point was the March 2014 conference. Money and goodwill had been found, with capable and organised volunteers creating a real buzz. A series of well-designed “feeder” events, questionnaires and seminars beforehand meant that it was not so much an “information-gathering” event for the Steering Group, but a slickly-run opportunity for people to learn who else in the city was at work on climate, facing what challenges, and having/lacking what “human capital” resources. Death-by-powerpoint and plasticine were nowhere to be seen, and even the write-up in Manchester Climate Monthly (back in print after a successful funding bid to Manchester Airport) was grudgingly neutral. Trust and profile had been built up slowly, by constant and honest communication in the run up to the conference. The idea of sending out “what would it take to make you want to spend a day talking about climate change?” survey in October 2013, and then building the agenda to meet those stated needs was widely regarded as a master-stroke.
The election process for the 2014-15 steering group was so straightforward that some cynics wondered why it hadn’t been done before. The anonymous feedback from the conference, promptly analysed and published, created a stir – it was mostly positive, and crowd-sourcing the “how can we improve further” was seen as, well, clever.
The Steering Group’s website had become the single “go to” place for information about ALL climate and environment related issues. As groups became aware of its usefulness, Metcalfe’s Law kicked in. On the calendar events, were “tagged” as, business, community, academic, biodiversity etc. It was initially a lot of work, but many people commented on how it gave them a sense of what was going on and how to get involved..
The website’s frequent blog posts – both by steering group members writing in a personal capacity, but also invited guest speakers created discussion and debate. There were controversies and no pretence that everyone would agree and that all was rosy. There were some issues with climate “trolls”, but not unmanageable ones. The fortnightly blog post from the chair were refreshingly candid, to the point of bluntness. His focus on “capacity building” for what he termed “adaptive governance” was seen by some as an excuse for inaction on mitigation, by others as realism about the need to become unshockable about coming surprises.
Still, there are some big unresolved issues, and those may always be with us
a) Can any one group like the Steering Group ever “manage” the overlapping but competing interests and expectations upon it. Should it even be trying, for instance, to get businessmen and community activists/”ordinary people” in the same room at the same time? To achieve what? Will this not just alienate one or the other constituency at any given time? Better to be the go-between than the master-of-ceremonies perhaps. Perhaps to acknowledge the de facto reality that the Steering Group had morphed into the successor for the 100 Months Club/Business in the Community.
b) Who is performing the watchdog function? Given the lack of stomach and teeth for it among the Steering Group members, growling – let alone biting – the Council for its rhetoric/reality gap was still being unofficially outsourced to “activists.”
c) And where is the bloody money coming from?
Video interview with Natalie Bennett, (leader of the Greens), last week when she was up in Manchester to launch Manchester Metropolitan University Young Greens.
Prebuttal of the tedious “you’re a partisan hack” thing
Yes, yesterday quoted a Lib Dem councillor approvingly. Today am posting an interview with a Green. Ergo *clearly* only interested in attacking the Labour Party. #confirmingsmears
Maybe read this?
Or this?