reposted from the excellent Salford Star
|
reposted from the excellent Salford Star
|

At TreeStation, we’re working towards a greener Manchester – our aim is to reduce carbon emissions and ‘make wood work’ in the local community.
We do routine treework around Greater Manchester and bring the wood back to our yard to process it into firewood, timber and woodchip! Nothing goes to waste and we sell our low-carbon products to the Manchester people 🙂
We want to reach out and engage with everyone in Manchester! At our family friendly event, we’re opening the gates to our members, friends and the local community.
AT OUR OPEN DAY:
– a chance to see what goes on behind the big, black gates
– tours around the yard
– slideshow of TreeStation projects & products
– showcase of local businesses and community organisations we’re working with
– kids play area
– refreshments & nibbles
We hope to see you there!
|
||
|
UPDATE: Sheffield Council produced a report two years ago.


Dear Councillors
re: report on the health impacts of climate change in Manchester and carbon literacy
Some of you may know that in April, the chair of the committee, Councillor Bev Craig, replied to a suggestion that the committee look at the impacts of climate change on Manchester. She wrote (in part)
As Chair of Health, I am happy to suggest to the committee this be considered in our work programme either as a standalone, or joint committee piece of work to look at the specific challenge facing Manchester to ensure that we are doing our best to mitigate it.
I am writing to you to ask that you support her suggestion. Although terrible heat waves like the one currently affecting parts of India (temperatures of 51 degrees, suicides, mass graves dug in preparation of expected deaths) will never hit Manchester, climate change will bring threats. The vulnerable among us (the old, the young, the sick, the poor) are in the firing line as they were in European heatwave of 2003.
A report to the Health Scrutiny Committee (or joint committees, as per the chair’s letter) could help Manchester’s citizens and organisations in their preparations. This would be especially likely if the report contained detail on what preparations are being made and could be made at a ward level, and how concerned councillors such as yourselves can catalyse work with partners, especially ‘hard-to-reach’ communities (I am thinking language and cultural barriers). Are the current plans realistic, updated regularly, and tested ‘in practice’? What can be learned from the recent floods in Greater Manchester? From further afield?
I am sorry that I can’t be with you tomorrow – I am getting to the business end of my PhD, and sadly a thesis doesn’t write itself. However, I, and other citizens of Manchester, will be watching the livestream or a recording of your deliberations.
Marc Hudson
PS It is also encouraging to see almost a third of the Health committee is already carbon literate. That is much higher proportion than Neighbourhoods and Economy, though its new chair – Councillor Kevin Peel – is arranging for carbon literacy sessions to be held after that committee’s next two meetings…
|
Councillor |
Carbon literacy status (based on information provided by the council in February 2016. If not up-to-date, please let me know. |
|
Councillor Bev Craig (Chair) |
At least face to face |
|
Neither |
|
|
Neither |
|
|
Neither |
|
|
Neither |
|
|
Carbon Literate |
|
|
Neither |
|
|
Carbon Literate |
|
|
Carbon Literate |
|
|
Face to face only |
|
|
New on council |
|
|
Unclear |
|
|
Carbon Literate |
Bat Walk & Survey at Birley
Wednesday, 1st June 2016
Time: 9-11pm
Join us & the South Lancashire Bat Group for a guided walk around Birley and nearby Hulme to find out more about bats and hopefully hear some of the amazing creatures!
Meet at Brooks Building reception at 9pm.
Brooks Building
Birley Campus
Bonsall Street
Manchester
M15 6GX
All welcome & all equipment will be provided.
Manchester Met Students will get 2 bronze MMU Futures points for attending.
This is a Free Event but you will need to register.
Sign up here.
*Please note that if the weather is not suitable for the event on 1st June we have an alternative date of 20thJune. All those who register for the above event will be notified in case of a change.
Only 1 of the 16 Council members tasked with keeping tabs on Manchester City Council’s environmental performance has actually completed “Carbon Literacy” training.
The recently re-named “Neighbourhoods and Environment” Scrutiny Committee is supposed to ask awkward questions of the Council and its partners. However, according to the latest information the Council was willing to release*, only one councillor – Chris Paul, Withington, has completed both the face to face and online components of “Carbon Literacy” training. Four councillors have completed the ‘face-to-face’ component, and one the online. 7 – including chair of the committee, Kevin Peel – had not completed either component, years after the scheme was introduced. Two other members of the committee – including Liberal Democrat John Leech – were not councillors until last week’s election. One is unaccounted for (see below)
Meanwhile, Manchester Labour’s manifesto included the promise to “roll out carbon literacy training.” They could start with their own environment committee, maybe?
Will its new chair, Kevin Peel, himself not carbon literate, show leadership and do everything in his power to make sure that ALL members of the committee that is supposed to scrutinise the Council’s environmental performance complete the Carbon Literacy training that Labour boasted about in its manifesto by the end of July (2016)?
Watch this space.
* According to information supplied in February 2016 by the Council, after MCFly had had to go to the Information Commissioner to get the data; if any councillors have completed the training in the meantime, they are welcome to contact MCFly on mcmonthly@gmail.com and we will update accordingly).
| Councillor |
Carbon Literacy Status |
|
Neither |
|
|
Neither |
|
|
Face to face |
|
|
Neither |
|
|
Was not on council |
|
|
Face to Face |
|
|
Was not on council |
|
|
Neither |
|
|
Neither |
|
|
Online only |
|
|
Face to face only |
|
|
Completed |
|
|
Councillor Kevin Peel (Chair) |
Neither |
|
Neither |
|
|
Not listed |
|
|
Face to Face |
Why doesn’t Manchester City Council put all its scrutiny committee meeting agendas on one web-page?
Is it just their usual incompetence and indolence, or are they trying to make it that leeeetle bit harder for citizens to know what is going on, how and when to engage?
Manchester City Council has 6 “scrutiny” committees that are supposed to keep tabs on what the 9 member Executive and the officers are up to. Supposed to. One of the problems is, there is – out of 96 councillors – only a single non-Labour councillor (John Leech, Lib Dem, in Didsbury West Ward). So, while there are some councillors with axes to grind and bones to pick, there are very few who will get hold of an awkward issue on which the council has been faaaaaaiiiiiiling consistently (take, oh, I don’t know, climate change as a random example) and ask specific questions, and then refuse to be fobbed off by the officer or Exec member. Failure to back off and accept the nonsense they spout would be a career-limiting move, you see. The people at the top do not reward such awkward independence that lets cats out of bag, skeletons out of closet.
But asides from them all being from the same party, the problems go deeper. Reports are opaque, delivered at short notice and there is simply too much for some committees to tackle. And councillors are just normal human beings (well, most of them), with other commitments (jobs, family, volunteering, helping people who are getting screwed by the Tories). So the amount of time and energy they can dedicate to piercing the propaganda is extremely limited.
Meanwhile, both the media and civil society are largely asleep at the wheel. [For more on all this, see here] .
So, scrutiny is an empty soothing ritual, where naïve activists go to get their belief in the representatives of representative democracy crushed.
If you DO want to go to a scrutiny committee meeting then please, for the love of gaia
a) do not go alone
b) do not go unprepared.
Some of the most miserable, horrible, soul-destroying hours of my life have been spent watching the farce that calls itself ‘scrutiny’.
It IS worth going (once or twice maybe), but not alone, and not unprepared. Srsly. Here’s a five minute video about what happens and some further advice.
Please feel free to contact MCFly – mcmonthly@gmail.com if you want more info.
Here below I have click click clicked through to all the specific pages of the website where the six scrutiny committee agendas are. The Council COULD, if it wanted, easily have one page where all the agendas were available. The fact that it doesn’t tells you exactly how much they care about keeping citizens informed.
Tuesday 24th May
Young People and Children’s
10am The Scrutiny Committee Room, Level 2, Town Hall Extension
Neighbourhoods
2pm The Scrutiny Committee Room, Level 2, Town Hall Extension
Wednesday 25th May
Economy
10am The Scrutiny Committee Room, Level 2, Town Hall Extension
Communities
2pm The Scrutiny Committee Room, Level 2, Town Hall Extension
Thursday 26th May
Finance
10am The Scrutiny Committee Room, Level 2, Town Hall Extension
Health
2pm The Scrutiny Committee Room, Level 2, Town Hall Extension
Professor Kevin Anderson (see January interview part 1, part 2 and part 3) speaking at the Carbon Coop AGM a couple of months ago.
Carbon Co-op AGM 2015 – Kevin Anderson from Carbon Co-op on Vimeo.
And here is the Q and A.
Manchester City Council has refused to put a specific number on its financial support for the “Steering Group”. While it has given the group over £ 100k, the Council has performed precisely zero cost-benefit analysis of what it is getting for that money.
While the Council has conceded that it gave the group a total of £30,999 in financial year 2015-6 (In 2014-5 it was £24,663.20, in 2016-17 it is – £27,000) it has so far refused to release an exact wages bill for the 1.8 Full Time Equivalent staff who have been seconded from the Council to work for the Steering Group, now a Community Interest Company.
The Council admits it has the information but isn’t going to release it (without a fight). The grounds? It claims it is “unable” to comply because the number is “exempt” on grounds of personal information (see below).
Instead of this information, which would say nothing about individual pay, the council has provided… the pay bands of the two staff, which is actually more personal information than would have been released if the Council had replied to the question with a straightforward number! MCFly is writing to the Council to request the basic information it asked for (see the bottom of this blog post for that email). If no joy, well, off to the Information Commissioner we go…
Back in April MCFly asked “The total value of the wages paid to Council staff from the beginning of their secondment, up until 13th April 2016.”
The reply said: “I confirm that the Council does hold the information that you have requested. However, having carefully considered the matter, the Council has determined that it is unable to comply with your request. This is because the requested information is exempt from disclosure under the following absolute exemption:
Section 40 Personal Information. This exemption applies because you have made a request for information which comprises or contains personal information about a third party. The Council has determined that the information relating to the third party should not be disclosed because disclosure would contravene one or more of the data protection principles under the Data Protection Act 1998, including the first principle that requires that information should be processed lawfully and fairly. This information is therefore exempt under sub-section 40(3)(a)(i). The Council is able to provide you with the grades and salary bandings of the officers that your enquiry relates to. These are outlined below.
Grade 9 £36,571 – £40,217
Grade 11 £44,143 – £47,240″
And here is the email that was sent to them last night.
Dear Sir /Madam,
thank you for your reply on May 12th
Re Information Request GAN/A82JS8.
I am writing to request an internal review with regards to the second question.
“The total value of the wages paid to Council staff from the beginning of their secondment, up until 13th April 2016.”
I do not believe that the exemption (40, personal information) that you cite applies in this case. Why? I am actually simply asking for a total aggregate number, NOT one that is broken down into the bill for the two staff.
Further, by informing me of their pay grades (which I did not previously know) and the pay bands for those pay grades (which I also did not know), you have breached their personal information MORE than you would have done so by simply providing a simple number. This simple number might of course have been perceived to be politically embarrassing, but that is NOT an exemption in the FOIA, as far as I am aware. If it is, please provide the number of that exemption.
Please also inform me of the time frame for the internal review. Thank you for the contact details of the Information Commissioner in the case that the internal review does not actually release this very simple information, which you have already stated that you have. (I had these contact details already – if you remember, I had to complain to them because Manchester City Council took a year to respond to a previous FoIA from me.) There is another FoIA that you are overdue on, but I’ll save that for another letter.
Many thanks!!
Marc Hudson
From here.
London-based, but MCFly asked about that and was told –
Platform is recruiting a new campaigner.
2.5 days per week – 20 hours (flexible) approx £31,000pa pro rata (based on a 40 hour week)
Deadline: noon on Monday 6th June.

Platform is looking for a new campaigner to work across a number of Platform projects. The successful candidate should be motivated to work towards climate justice, to democratise our energy system, and overcome oppression. They will work as part of a team on several Platform projects. These may include Fossil Free Culture, Voices that Shake!, Switched On London, building energy democracy, and mobilising to stop Europe’s new fossil fuel pipelines.
This is a flexible role. We expect the post-holder to particularly focus on one or more of the following:
Depending on the candidate’s strengths and motivation, the role can develop to emphasise one or more of these aspects.
In any case, the campaigner will be responsible for:

Please download the job description and person specification with details of how to apply.
If you would like to discuss the role or the application process informally, email us on info@platformlondon.org (you can ask us to ring you!). If you’re unsure about something in the person specs, please give us a call!
Application Deadline:
Please submit your application by noon on Monday 6th June.
We are aiming to conduct a 1st round of interviews on 13th and 14th June, and a second round on 20th or 21st June.
Platform strives to apply equal opportunities principles both in its recruitment and in its work. We oppose all forms of discrimination on the grounds of colour, race, nationality, ethnic or national origin, gender, sexuality, marital status, religion, age or disability.
The successful candidate will be selected on the basis of how well they fit the person specification, as judged by their application materials and their interview performance.
We would particularly like to encourage applications from people of colour / black or brown people, who are currently under-represented in Platform. Where two or more candidates are judged to be of equal merit, priority may be given to a BME candidate as these groups are less well represented.
Due to the ridiculous and racist border restrictions in the UK, Platform is unfortunately unable to arrange work permits for applicants without UK residency.
– See more at: http://platformlondon.org/campaigner-vacancy-2016/#sthash.GvyDXiNv.dpuf